Teams

GAC GREEN

2022 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.95 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-15vs EM YELLOWWon 21
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Barnacle / Jeremy de Lange vs Andi Renshaw / Jim Renshaw3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDebbie Yoon / Gabriel Damico vs Becca Mahoney / Benjamin Kuruvila6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKhanh Huyen / DAVID SERAFIN vs Pia Lisle / Mark Lindstrom6-3, 6-3
2022-05-08vs SSLT GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarcus McAskin / Stephanie McCauley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChris Cremer / Elizabeth Barnacle vs Phillip Barnes / Bea Barnes7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChelsea Ye / DAVID SERAFIN vs George Tavarez / Nola Nelson6-4, 6-4
2022-05-01vs CACM GOLDLost 12
W#1 DoublesStephanie McCauley / Chris Cremer vs Wade Schutte / Mary Beth Church6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChelsea Ye / Andrew Landon vs Eric Mayer / Kay Roesch2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMichael Kim / Khanh Huyen vs Amy Springer / Nate Moeller7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-24vs LTFC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie McCauley / Marcus McAskin vs Tracy Bourque / Lance Bourque3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Barnacle / Chris Cremer vs Yvette Watson / Paul Jackson6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGabriel Damico / Debbie Yoon vs Greg Brooks / Nancy Brooks4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-17vs LTFC BRONZEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeremy de Lange / Stephanie McCauley vs Cathie Frazzini / Mark Dwyer6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChris Cremer / Debbie Yoon vs Cristina Denezza / Joshua Jessup6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKhanh Huyen / Andrew Landon vs Joy Herrin / Tyler Kean6-3, 6-4
2022-04-10vs EM YELLOWLost 12
W#1 DoublesChris Cremer / Elizabeth Barnacle vs Gregory Fritsch / Stacy Roode4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGabriel Damico / Debbie Yoon vs Beattie Leonard / Elizabeth Leonard4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDAVID SERAFIN / Khanh Huyen vs Sean OConnor / Lisa OConnor7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2022-04-03vs SSLT GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarcus McAskin / Stephanie McCauley vs Kristin Janos / Sean Hudelson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGabriel Damico / Elizabeth Barnacle vs Bea Barnes / Phillip Barnes6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKhanh Huyen / DAVID SERAFIN vs Joey Rothman / George Tavarez6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Chris Cremer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.25
Khanh Huyen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
4.05
Chelsea Ye
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Debbie Yoon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Gabriel Damico
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Marcus McAskin
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.68
Elizabeth Barnacle
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.42
DAVID SERAFIN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Andrew Landon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Michael Keirns
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jeremy de Lange
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lindsey Carpenter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Stephanie McCauley
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Barnacle + Chris Cremer11166% games+6.4% vs expected
Lindsey Carpenter + Michael Keirns8159% games+5.5% vs expected
Gabriel Damico + Debbie Yoon1443% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Barnacle + Gabriel Damico134 matchesnot enough data
Khanh Huyen + DAVID SERAFIN213 matchesnot enough data
Chris Cremer + Chelsea Ye123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chris Cremer
110W–54L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Khanh Huyen
91W–70L career · 9 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Chelsea Ye
92W–114L career · 4 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Debbie Yoon
24W–66L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Gabriel Damico
19W–18L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Marcus McAskin
37W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Elizabeth Barnacle
109W–78L career · 7 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
3.5
DAVID SERAFIN
100W–24L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Andrew Landon
28W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Michael Keirns
46W–37L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
2.93
Jeremy de Lange
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lindsey Carpenter
38W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie McCauley
35W–10L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.