Teams

CLin (WSRC)

2025 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Mixed 3.5 - Mon PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-21vs KGissy/BDavis (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSilvia Petrikis / Dhruv Bhatt vs Enes Maxhuni / Qianyi Zhao6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2025-07-14vs CSpera (Blakeney)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesDhruv Bhatt / Silvia Petrikis vs Cynthia Spera / Kevin Fox4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesEmily Brandon / Bennett Terada vs Billy Stover / Jennifer Robinette5-7, 5-7
2025-07-07vs JDichak (WSRC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDhruv Bhatt / Silvia Petrikis vs April Greer / Ron Dock6-1, 6-2
2025-06-30vs KSwain (Park Road)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDhruv Bhatt / Wendy Ranadive vs Satya Manikonda / Teneika Funderburk7-6, 6-0
2025-06-26vs HFranc (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Brandon / Bennett Terada vs Shelley Crocker / Anthony Bertucci6-7, 2-6
2025-06-23vs CKing/SMcDonald (Life Time)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSilvia Petrikis / Chris Landy vs Harpreet Sood / Susan McDonald1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-06-02vs KGissy/BDavis (Queens)Won 20
W#2 DoublesCaden Greer / Silvia Petrikis vs Katie Perry / Yuefeng Han6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEmily Brandon / Bennett Terada vs Chuanxin Zhou / Kim Gissy3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-19vs CSpera (Blakeney)Won 10
W#2 DoublesDhruv Bhatt / Silvia Petrikis vs Kevin Fox / Michele Olsen7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 3.5 - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Caden Greer
published 4
3.54
Chin Lin
published 3.5
3.46
Bennett Terada
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Jessica Cook
published
3.37
Emily Brandon
published
3.34
Wendy Ranadive
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Adele Petrikis
published 3.5
3.26
Silvia Petrikis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.82
Carleigh Miller
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Silvia Petrikis + Bennett Terada314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caden Greer
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Chin Lin
51W–28L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54
3.5
Bennett Terada
61W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Jessica Cook
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
Emily Brandon
14W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Wendy Ranadive
43W–48L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Adele Petrikis
7W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Silvia Petrikis
14W–13L career · type M · 8 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
3
Carleigh Miller
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.