Teams

Wyndham Warriors Houff

2022 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-02vs KRA FenchukWon 10
W#1 DoublesHenry Wood / Brian Zollinhofer vs Jory Brinkerhoff / Joe Lacroix6-3, 7-5
2022-10-26vs Avalon LuchsingerWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Zollinhofer / Richard Sherman vs Gary Wills / Carey Donovan6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-19vs Westwood GereckeWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrad Houff / Brian Zollinhofer vs Samuel Highfill / Dutch Jones6-0, 6-2
2022-10-05vs Belmont PrestiaWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrad Houff / Henry Wood vs Tanner Bonovitch / Theo Prestia6-1, 6-2
2022-09-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrad Houff / Richard Sherman vs Jim Riley / David Scheetz3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 DoublesRichard Sherman / Brian Zollinhofer vs Dylan Brod / Miguel Romero6-1, 6-0
2022-09-21vs Belmont ArcaroWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrad Houff / Brian Zollinhofer vs Alton Howell / Jim Swisher6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Brian Zollinhofer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Richard Sherman
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.82
Henry Wood
published 4
3.77
Aric Mueller
published 4
3.59
Brad Houff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
STEVEN ROBERTS
published
3.27
Doug Blouch
published 3.5
3.26
Bert Foreman
published 3.5
Chad Eldridge
published 3.5
3.12
Jay Harter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brad Houff + Brian Zollinhofer12560% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Zollinhofer
212W–79L career · 5 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
4
Richard Sherman
173W–54L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Henry Wood
13W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Aric Mueller
13W–18L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Brad Houff
114W–106L career · 4 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
STEVEN ROBERTS
16W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Doug Blouch
26W–29L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Bert Foreman
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Chad Eldridge
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jay Harter
6W–19L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.