Teams

Schnieder

2025 Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-09-20Won 10
W#2 DoublesThomas Swann / William Bloomquist vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-06vs Athlete4EverLost 01
L#3 DoublesThomas Schneider / William Bloomquist vs Marc Favors / Samuel Hughes1-6, 3-6
2025-09-03vs Athlete4EverWon 10
W#3 DoublesWilliam Bloomquist / Thomas Swann vs Samuel Hughes / William Stevenson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesThomas Swann / William Bloomquist vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-18vs HillWon 10
W#2 DoublesWilliam Bloomquist / Robert Duckman vs Richard Snader / Peter Schanck6-1, 6-1
2025-06-11vs HillLost 01
L#2 DoublesWilliam Bloomquist / George Rigler vs Steve Newcomer / Hal Bloom5-7, 1-6
2025-06-06vs HillWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoseph Touzin / William Bloomquist vs Steve Newcomer / Philip Dales6-1, 7-5
2025-06-04vs HillWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoseph Touzin / William Bloomquist vs Steve Newcomer / Peter Schanck6-1, 6-4
2025-06-01vs HillWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Stevens / Joseph Touzin vs Richard Amos / Frank Burnett6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Joseph Touzin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
William Bloomquist
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.10
William Willard
published
George Rigler
published
Jim Slaughter
published
Michael Stevens
published
Saverio Pellegrino
published
Thomas Schneider
published
William Dodd
published
William Norman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Touzin + William Bloomquist5164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Joseph Touzin
37W–12L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.38
3.5
William Bloomquist
68W–81L career · 8 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
William Willard
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
George Rigler
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jim Slaughter
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Stevens
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Saverio Pellegrino
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Schneider
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
William Dodd
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
William Norman
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.