Teams

MWalters (Carmel)

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-31vs AEagan/SSamuelson (WRSC)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesStefania Faraj / Abbie Conte vs Anne Lynn / Savannah Samuelson4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Lilly / Michele Simpson vs Kelli Massaro / Renata Riechelmann6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-08-24vs TRicks (Queens)Split 11
L#1 DoublesMeghan Walters / Stephanie Parker vs Lindsey Pond / Jenny Wilken6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMegan Francis / Stefania Faraj vs Katie Sontag / Kate Murphy6-4, 6-1
2026-08-17vs PSweeney (FCC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesRobyn Hayward / Jennifer Hutson vs Jennifer Herlong / TARA RAND6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelly Lilly / Jennifer Harrison vs Kristen Petras / Joanne Hurley6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Kaiser / Maureen Hussey vs Meghan Rawlings / Danielle Fricke6-2, 7-5
2026-08-10vs CAckels (PCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMeghan Walters / Sara Porrata vs Julia Murphy / Lisa Sciortino6-3, 6-1
2026-08-03vs APessina/LAbhoulson (Queens)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMeghan Walters / Robyn Hayward vs Carole Ann Araiza / Katie Monson6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAbbie Conte / Jennifer Harrison vs Deb Childress / Morgan Jaulin1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesStefania Faraj / Megan Francis vs Andrea Whitmore / Emily Baker6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings35 teams · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Robyn Hayward
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Abbie Conte
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Sara Porrata
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Kelly Lilly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Kelly Kaiser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Michele Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Stefania Faraj
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.99
Megan Francis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Meghan Walters
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Maureen Hussey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Deborah Biggers
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Walters + Robyn Hayward5070% games+19.3% vs expected
Sara Porrata + Meghan Walters5169% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Robyn Hayward
51W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Abbie Conte
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Sara Porrata
65W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Kelly Lilly
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Kelly Kaiser
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
Michele Simpson
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
43%56%<1%
3.02
Stefania Faraj
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Megan Francis
13W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.99
3
Meghan Walters
44W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.93
Maureen Hussey
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%1%99%
2.83
3
Deborah Biggers
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.