Teams

Fuzzy Yellow Balls

2022 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-06vs Cryan BrothersWon 20
W#2 SinglesBruce Clark vs Anthony Olbrich6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRoland Radke / Shaun Jensen vs Chris Angermayer / Matthew Rubio6-3, 6-0
2022-06-27vs N.A.D.S.Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBruce Clark / David Pilliod vs Randy Fullmer / Gilbert Rodriguez3-6, 1-6
2022-06-22Won 10
W#2 SinglesBruce Clark vs Jim Brennan6-0, 6-3
2022-06-15vs N.A.D.S.Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRoland Radke / Bruce Clark vs Scott Crane / Bill Rauer3-6, 4-6
2022-06-13vs Cryan BrothersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTom Michael / Roland Radke vs Frederick Noble / Mark Smith5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBruce Clark vs Anthony Olbrich7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-06vs N.A.D.S.Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBruce Clark / Todd Clark vs Bill Rauer / Gilbert Rodriguez0-6, 4-6
2022-06-01vs Cryan BrothersSplit 11
L#2 DoublesTodd Clark / Bruce Clark vs Matthew Rubio / David Sparks6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesOrlando Ciniglio / Roland Radke vs Chris Angermayer / Jim Brennan6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Aldo Juarez
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 3.5
3.20
Randy Dewey
published 3.5
2.98
David Pilliod
published 3
2.87
Orlando Ciniglio
published 3
2.36
Kevin Hartsig
published 2.5
Bruce Clark
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Roland Radke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Shaun Jensen
published
Tom Michael
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Hartsig + Bruce Clark0637% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Hartsig + Aldo Juarez2441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aldo Juarez
94W–71L career · 8 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Randy Dewey
118W–125L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3
David Pilliod
47W–50L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Orlando Ciniglio
89W–83L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.87
2.5
Kevin Hartsig
37W–176L career · no lines in 2022
0%87%13%
2.36
Bruce Clark
13W–20L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Roland Radke
27W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shaun Jensen
15W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tom Michael
55W–84L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.