Teams

*3-PostRust/McGill-DFC

2024 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-07-31vs *2-JPerry-CHTCLost 12
L#1 SinglesAmanda Lacoff vs Sheridan Meltsner1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesChrista McGill vs Adrianne Leinbach6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-15vs *1-KFuller-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesDayna Kelly vs Nancy Pack3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesChrista McGill vs Kristen Fuller3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-07-08vs *4-EWyngaarden-HRLost 02
L#1 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Katie Neal0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesChrista McGill vs Beth Huebner6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2024-07-01vs *2-JPerry-CHTCLost 12
L#1 SinglesChrista McGill vs Oxana Gorbacheva1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Adrianne Leinbach2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Andy Blackburn6-3, 6-1
2024-06-24vs *1-KFuller-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesDayna Kelly vs Carolyn Lee1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Nancy Pack0-6, 1-6
2024-06-17vs *4-EWyngaarden-HRLost 02
L#1 SinglesAmanda Lacoff vs Mary Feger6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesChrista McGill vs Tiffany Langino2-6, 3-6
2024-06-10vs *2-JPerry-CHTCWon 30
W#1 SinglesDayna Kelly vs Jenny Perry6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesChrista McGill vs Leah Weinberger6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAmanda Lacoff vs Sheridan Meltsner6-2, 6-2
2024-06-03vs *1-KFuller-EnoSplit 11
L#1 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Nancy Pack5-7, 0-6
W#2 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Meghan Rider7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-20vs *4-EWyngaarden-HRWon 20
W#1 SinglesDayna Kelly vs Beth Huebner7-5, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAmanda Lacoff vs Carrie Couto6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Dayna Kelly
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.92
Chanel Chambers
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.71
Susana Harvey
published 3.5
3.66
Amanda Lacoff
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.65
Susie Post-Rust
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.58
Christa McGill
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dayna Kelly + Christa McGill8358% games+3.5% vs expected
Susie Post-Rust + Susana Harvey1445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dayna Kelly
126W–99L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Chanel Chambers
202W–97L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.92
3.5
Susana Harvey
401W–157L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.71
4
Amanda Lacoff
189W–114L career · 4 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Susie Post-Rust
81W–93L career · 5 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Christa McGill
119W–123L career · 6 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.