Teams

NE-Reg - Studts/Erwin

18 & Over Mixed- Sept. 9-11 · 7.0 MXD

10 players · average NTRP 4.20 / KANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · 7.0 MXD
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK-Reg-Ogle-Pappas000000
2STL-Reg- McGowan/18&Over7.0MXD000000
3HOA-REG-Abel/18&Over7.0MXD000000
4NE-Reg - Studts/Erwin000000
5MO-WC1-Cabrera000000
6IA-REG-000000
7MO-Reg-Kim/18&Over7.0MXD000000
8KS-REG-Bharati/Solovey/18&Over7.0MXD000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adam Studts
published 4.5
Grayson Arnold
published 4.5
3.91
Anne Olsen
published 4.5
3.72
Jane Strawhecker
published
3.53
Amy Studts
published 4
3.25
Elana Harm
published 3.5
3.12
Wasim Shariff
published
Savannah Maisel
published
Ty Strawhecker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Studts + Adam Studts17174% games+34.7% vs expected
Grayson Arnold + Radha Kanneganti Perue213 matchesnot enough data
Wasim Shariff + Jane Strawhecker303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Adam Studts
38W–4L career · type M · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Grayson Arnold
36W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Anne Olsen
97W–53L career · no lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
3.91
Jane Strawhecker
71W–30L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Amy Studts
54W–26L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Elana Harm
37W–37L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.25
Wasim Shariff
26W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%19%81%
3.12
Radha Kanneganti Perue
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Savannah Maisel
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ty Strawhecker
34W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.