Teams

Purple-Lightheart

St. George Tri-Level (3.0 · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-18vs Red-DrabickiLost 03
L#1 DoublesDione Russell / Debbie Barbaroussis-Goot vs Jill Russell / Sharlene Bronson2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDarla Beutler / Sara Stewart vs Diane Bazley / Lisa Bledsoe0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLesa Day / Suzy Duce vs Camille Jennings / Suzanne Jensen3-6, 2-6
2025-09-11vs Red-DrabickiLost 02
L#2 DoublesSara Stewart / Dione Russell vs Janelle Horton / Lisa Bledsoe4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBecky Nelson / Andrea Ward vs Suzanne Jensen / Camille Jennings2-6, 2-6
2025-09-09vs Red-DrabickiLost 02
L#2 DoublesJanet Lightheart / Dione Russell vs Janelle Horton / Lisa Bledsoe3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBecky Nelson / Suzy Duce vs Camille Jennings / Suzanne Jensen5-7, 3-6
2025-09-04vs Red-DrabickiWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaricel Renigen / Debbie Barbaroussis-Goot vs Jill Russell / Nancy Drabicki6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDarla Beutler / Kandace Wittwer vs Janelle Horton / Lisa Bledsoe0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJanet Lightheart / Andrea Ward vs Camille Jennings / Suzanne Jensen7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-28vs Red-DrabickiWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlexa Morgan / Julie Morgan vs Nancy Drabicki / Sharlene Bronson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDione Russell / Kandace Wittwer vs Emily Christensen / Diane Bazley5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLesa Day / Suzy Duce vs Suzanne Jensen / Rena Bucad6-4, 6-4
2025-05-15vs Red-DrabickiWon 20
W#2 DoublesAlexa Morgan / Julie Morgan vs Janelle Horton / Diane Bazley4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBecky Nelson / Andrea Ward vs Rena Bucad / Bethany Baker6-2, 6-2
2025-05-15vs Red-DrabickiWon 30
W#1 DoublesDebbie Barbaroussis-Goot / Maricel Renigen vs Sharlene Bronson / Hilary Koch6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDarla Beutler / Dione Russell vs Emily Christensen / Lisa Bledsoe4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSuzy Duce / Lesa Day vs Bethany Baker / Rena Bucad6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Maricel Renigen
published 4
3.57
Debbie Barbaroussis-Goot
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Mary Mathews
published
3.28
Dione Russell
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Alexa Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Darla Beutler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Kandace Wittwer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Sara Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Becky Nelson
published 3
Andrea Ward
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Janet Lightheart
published 3
Lesa Day
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Suzy Duce
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maricel Renigen + Mary Mathews5257% games+2.6% vs expected
Janet Lightheart + Dione Russell9948% games−1.5% vs expected
Dione Russell + Sara Stewart2348% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Barbaroussis-Goot + Maricel Renigen404 matchesnot enough data
Dione Russell + Darla Beutler314 matchesnot enough data
Suzy Duce + Lesa Day213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Maricel Renigen
51W–21L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Debbie Barbaroussis-Goot
31W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Mary Mathews
43W–61L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Dione Russell
28W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Alexa Morgan
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Darla Beutler
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Kandace Wittwer
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Sara Stewart
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Becky Nelson
71W–88L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Andrea Ward
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Janet Lightheart
53W–80L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.75
Lesa Day
5W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzy Duce
10W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.