Teams

Hall/Sampson

2023 Montgomery Adult Other Fall Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-13vs Ahmed/SpencerLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Rabin / Catherine Iosue vs Lindsay Hicks / Rachele Stines6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-12-08vs Norbeck Kickin AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathryn Sampson / Leigh Leslie vs Whitney Duffy / Lucy Sullivan6-7, 2-6
2023-12-06vs Manor 3.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Iosue / Chung Kim vs Glynis Kazanjian / Meredith Webb3-6, 0-6
2023-11-16vs Ahmed/SpencerLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Iosue / Karen Rabin vs Lindsay Hicks / Rachele Stines3-6, 2-6
2023-11-08vs Norbeck Kickin AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarjorie Guroff / Catherine Iosue vs Whitney Duffy / Laura Reif6-2, 6-2
2023-10-30vs Manor 3.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesNancy Davis / Leigh Leslie vs Glynis Kazanjian / Marie Kushlis2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Iosue / Karen Rabin vs Ashleigh Murray / Karen Parker6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Catherine Iosue
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.77
Nancy Davis
published
Debbie Talesnick
published 3
2.73
Karen Rabin
published
2.71
Leigh Leslie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
2.69
Chung Kim
published 3
2.59
Kathryn Sampson
published
2.46
Marjorie Guroff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Iosue + Karen Rabin3438% games−9.6% vs expected
Renee Jenkins-Woodard + Marjorie Guroff033 matchesnot enough data
Chung Kim + Nancy Davis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Catherine Iosue
127W–112L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
Nancy Davis
16W–30L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Debbie Talesnick
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Rabin
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Leigh Leslie
109W–137L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
Renee Jenkins-Woodard
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Chung Kim
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
Kathryn Sampson
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
2.59
Marjorie Guroff
2W–12L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.