Teams

Heron Bay - Goetz

2023 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Spring Night · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-27vs Midtown - MontserratLost 01
L#3 DoublesMaria Rendon / Diana Bastias vs Anabella Este / Yrma Petersen5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2023-06-15vs Wrc - LandWon 20
W#2 DoublesMaria Rendon / Cheri Tishman vs Stacey Greaves / Lory Strickland7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesEsther Lem vs Maria Valeria Yandet7-6, 6-3
2023-06-08vs Dillon - CarrenoWon 20
W#1 SinglesEsther Lem vs Diana Latuff7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesClaudia Garcia / Diana Bastias vs Karla Hernandez / Silvia Carreno6-4, 6-3
2023-05-16vs Midtown - MontserratWon 20
W#1 DoublesClaudia Garcia / Diana Bastias vs Yrma Petersen / Maria Escarra6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEsther Lem vs Claudia Candela6-0, 6-2
2023-05-16vs Broward/Contreras/A18&Over3.5Won 10
W#2 SinglesEsther Lem vs Yvonne Dacal6-3, 7-6
2023-05-08vs Jetc - RogersonWon 10
W#1 SinglesEsther Lem vs Alix Chun6-4, 6-1
2023-05-03vs Wrc - LandWon 10
W#2 SinglesEsther Lem vs Andrea Barci6-0, 6-2
2023-04-19vs Sunrise - DominiqueWon 20
W#1 SinglesEsther Lem vs Barbara Mariani6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDiana Bastias / DIANA TSU vs Blossom Allen / Abrella Lacey7-6, 6-4
2023-04-05vs Dillon - CarrenoWon 10
W#2 SinglesEsther Lem vs Silvia Carreno6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Gina Goetz
published 4
3.75
Esther Lem
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.71
Daniela CASTILLO
published 4
3.31
Daniela Romay
published 3.5
3.24
Maria Rendon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Monica Rosenberg
published
3.04
Claudia Garcia
published 3.5
2.99
Diana Bastias
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gina Goetz + Esther Lem4170% games+16.1% vs expected
Maria Rendon + Monica Rosenberg1543% games−2.3% vs expected
Diana Bastias + Maria Rendon11042% games−7.2% vs expected
Diana Bastias + Claudia Garcia224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gina Goetz
30W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
4.01
4
Esther Lem
63W–43L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Daniela CASTILLO
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Daniela Romay
29W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Maria Rendon
45W–40L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Monica Rosenberg
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Claudia Garcia
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Diana Bastias
38W–61L career · 4 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.