Teams

EUnderwood (Russell)

2024 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Fri AM

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-19vs JGieker (Lifetime)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRobin Perkins / Leigh Ingram vs Susan Knowlton / Kathleen Ciminelli5-7, 4-6
2024-04-12vs KFoster (WSRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPATRICIA DRIES / Mary Wegener vs Kelley Montroy / AMY SAFIR1-6, 1-6
2024-03-29vs MDevendorf (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLeigh Ingram / Sharon Norman vs Susan Dunn / Rachel Drees5-7, 2-6
2024-03-22vs EKyle (FCC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Wegener / PATRICIA DRIES vs Lorna O'Callaghan / Tammy Ward3-6, 0-6
2024-03-15vs LMaloney/KHammack (OPRC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLeigh Ingram / Michelle Goins vs Edie Butler Rowe / Alyce Lofgren1-6, 2-6
2024-03-08vs LSobodash (Pine Lake CC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Wegener / PATRICIA DRIES vs Dottie Boone / Robin Boyles4-6, 6-7
2024-03-07vs LWallace/BHoff (Carmel)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDebbie Barnes / Mary Wegener vs Laura Wallace / Angie Michaud7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2024-03-05vs HDaly (PCC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesLinda Glass / Leigh Ingram vs Tonja Padgett / Sylvia Walker6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Fri AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
PATRICIA DRIES
published
3.25
Terri Hood
published
3.20
Kate Palanica
published
3.20
Janet Fiedor
published
3.14
Sharon Norman
published
3.07
Ellen Underwood
published 3
3.06
Michelle Goins
published
3.05
Linda Glass
published
3.02
Leigh Ingram
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.80
Mary Wegener
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Robin Perkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Wegener + Leigh Ingram3840% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Norman + Leigh Ingram2346% gamesnot enough data
Janet Fiedor + Terri Hood134 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Norman + Terri Hood303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

PATRICIA DRIES
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Terri Hood
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Kate Palanica
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Janet Fiedor
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.20
Sharon Norman
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
Ellen Underwood
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.07
Michelle Goins
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.06
Linda Glass
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Leigh Ingram
29W–48L career · 4 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Mary Wegener
15W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
Robin Perkins
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.