Teams

Salt (chilling)

2022 Mixed 55 & Over · 9.0 Combined

11 players · average NTRP 4.20 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-13vs Pepper (Traveling)Split 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Gorecki / Sherry Taylor vs Dana Metzger / Paul Reiss3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesWilliam Schlueter / Amy Siebenman vs Shannon Lemp / James Barenkamp6-4, 7-6
2022-10-13vs Pepper (Traveling)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesWilliam Schlueter / Antoinette Kovar vs Dana Metzger / Paul Reiss3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPhilip Kammann / Amy Siebenman vs Felice Rolnick / James Barenkamp4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-10-13vs Pepper (Traveling)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesWilliam Schlueter / Antoinette Kovar vs Felice Rolnick / James Barenkamp6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPhilip Kammann / Amy Siebenman vs Dana Metzger / Paul Reiss4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesShannon Lemp / Sam Shouldis vs David Gorecki / Lisa Campbell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-16vs Pepper (Traveling)Won 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Campbell / William Schlueter vs Dana Metzger / Paul Reiss4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSherry Taylor / David Gorecki vs Felice Rolnick / Jon Tchen6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAntoinette Kovar / Philip Kammann vs Elizabeth Spencer / Sam Shouldis4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-09-12vs Pepper (Traveling)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesChristine Wheeland / William Schlueter vs Laura Dyer / Lyndon Morgan2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAntoinette Kovar / David Gorecki vs Dana Metzger / Paul Reiss6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAnne Dressel Sutter / Scott Sutter vs Felice Rolnick / James Barenkamp2-6, 1-6
2022-09-08vs Pepper (Traveling)Won 21
W#1 DoublesSherry Taylor / William Schlueter vs Laura Dyer / Lyndon Morgan4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Dressel Sutter / Scott Sutter vs Dana Metzger / Paul Reiss6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAntoinette Kovar / Philip Kammann vs Felice Rolnick / James Barenkamp4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Combined
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Salt (chilling)4281024178
2Pepper (Traveling)2410819163

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Scott Sutter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.15
Sherry Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.97
Philip Kammann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.94
Antoinette Kovar
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.94
William Schlueter
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.93
Anne Dressel Sutter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.81
Sam Shouldis
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.73
Christine Wheeland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
David Gorecki
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.46
Amy Siebenman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
Lisa Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Sutter + Anne Dressel Sutter101742% games−7.2% vs expected
Christine Wheeland + Sam Shouldis1448% gamesnot enough data
Philip Kammann + Antoinette Kovar224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Sutter
65W–59L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
4.16
Sherry Taylor
50W–72L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.15
Philip Kammann
81W–116L career · 6 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.97
4.5
Antoinette Kovar
80W–69L career · 5 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.94
William Schlueter
70W–93L career · 6 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.94
4.5
Anne Dressel Sutter
17W–52L career · 2 lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.93
Sam Shouldis
192W–126L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Christine Wheeland
67W–61L career · 1 line in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
David Gorecki
91W–103L career · 4 lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
3.48
4
Amy Siebenman
99W–132L career · 8 lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.46
Lisa Campbell
2W–4L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.