Teams

Yonkers Tennis Center - Day Deuces

2025 18&over Women SUMMER DAY · 3.0 Day

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-11vs Flint Park Village PeopleLost 12
W#1 DoublesStephanie Balkin / Sarah Miller vs Wendy Sayles / Ann Goode5-7, 5-4
L#1 SinglesJoan Lavin vs Erin Claytor2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Page / Amy Listerman vs Sarah Dunn / Stephanie Secchia4-6, 3-6
2025-06-27vs Birchwood BallersWon 32
W#1 DoublesStephanie Balkin / Sarah Garcia vs Jenn Salon / Helen Sherwood6-7, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLisa Schneider vs Kate Pershing0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAmy Listerman / Suzanne Page vs Michele Gregson / Nayoung Lee6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJoan Lavin vs Katherine Burgess2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLeana Rahman / Nancy Aranow vs Vaishali Bhattacharyya / Lise Mulderig6-4, 6-3
2025-06-20vs Sportime Harbor IslandLost 13
L#1 SinglesCarol Tse vs Sarah Raeben4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCaitlin Chang / Amy Listerman vs Lisa Ferree / Rebecca Stern4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAngie Calderwood vs April Klein6-4, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Fontana / Olivia Donovan vs Kathleen Charla / Laurie Medvinsky3-6, 5-7
2025-06-13vs The Pelham Forever InsLost 13
W#1 DoublesRebekah Hunker / Alicia Cintron vs Rachel Tulchin / Evgenia Goncharova6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLisa Schneider vs Alexandra Dudar4-3
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Page / Karen Arnett vs Nia Breygin / Sarah Kim4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMaureen Maitland / Patricia Coomaraswamy vs Chandra Turner / Erendira Matzumura1-6, 3-6
2025-06-11vs MKCC Drop Shot DivasLost 23
L#1 DoublesKaren Arnett / Stephanie Balkin vs Leah Zygler / Lisa Shaiken0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLisa Schneider vs Paige Siek0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Aranow / Rebekah Hunker vs Lindsay Nakash / Laura Feinerman7-5, 2-5
W#2 SinglesCarol Tse vs Kelly Aidekman6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesOlivia Donovan / Anna Fontana vs Marissa Kornblau / Danielle Cohen6-7, 4-3
2025-06-06vs CRRC - Chestnut RidgeLost 23
W#1 DoublesSarah Miller / Caitlin Chang vs Karryn Angoff / Heather Rhyu3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRebekah Hunker vs Rebecca Blumenthal1-6, 5-5
L#2 DoublesKaren Arnett / Sarah Garcia vs Karen Schneider / Cori Landry6-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAngie Calderwood vs Becky Scott3-4
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Page / Amy Listerman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-30vs WTC: Day-3.0 18+ KISS MY ACEWon 32
W#1 DoublesSarah Garcia / Suzanne Page vs Lea Loveland / Georgia Dyer1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCaitlin Chang vs Megan McFarland6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAmy Listerman / Stephanie Balkin vs Puja Chandiramani / Danielle Tormey4-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesCarol Tse vs Kelly Walsh7-6, 5-1
L#3 DoublesOlivia Donovan / Anna Fontana vs Katie Bellmare / Emily Tisdale6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-05-23vs Sportime MBYC - ARMADALost 04
L#1 DoublesKaren Arnett / Sarah Garcia vs Erica MacGregor / Bridget Bennett5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAngie Calderwood vs Pamela Sheeran3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Aranow / Sarah Miller vs Rebecca Wasserman / Colleen van Valen3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAmy Listerman / Suzanne Page vs Maureen Winner / LINDSAY NAZE3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 DoublesSarah Miller / Carol Tse vs Eileen ORourke / Hilary Clarke6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlicia Cintron / Patricia Coomaraswamy vs Annette Cappucci / Amy Goodman6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAngie Calderwood vs Jennifer Dedona6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Arnett / Stephanie Balkin vs Elise Hubsher / Caitlin Baer6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.0 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Flint Park Village People09301128296
2WTC: Day-3.0 18+ KISS MY ACE09281539355
3The Pelham Forever Ins09211948413
4Yonkers Tennis Center - Day Deuces09152555416
5CRRC - Chestnut Ridge09142556437
6MKCC Drop Shot Divas09152458440
7Birchwood Ballers09142961445
8New York Athletic Club: Lovely Ladies0953171466

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Deanna Santoro
published 3.5
2.99
Angie Calderwood
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.94
Sarah Miller
published
2.92
Rebekah Hunker
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Carol Tse
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Lisa Schneider
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.81
Alicia Cintron
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Stephanie Balkin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Caitlin Chang
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Suzanne Page
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.71
Patricia Coomaraswamy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.68
Nancy Aranow
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Karen Arnett
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.65
Leana Rahman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.47
Amy Listerman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.25
Anna Fontana
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Joan Lavin
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Maureen Maitland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Garcia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Schneider + Carol Tse2352% games+9.1% vs expected
Alicia Cintron + Patricia Coomaraswamy6653% games+9.0% vs expected
Lisa Schneider + Stephanie Balkin121053% games+8.9% vs expected
Carol Tse + Karen Arnett3347% games+7.1% vs expected
Sarah Miller + Stephanie Balkin9555% games+5.5% vs expected
Suzanne Page + Amy Listerman1542% games+0.9% vs expected
Sarah Miller + Lisa Schneider91047% games+0.5% vs expected
Karen Arnett + Amy Listerman4346% games+0.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deanna Santoro
93W–92L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3
Angie Calderwood
18W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
Sarah Miller
35W–46L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%32%
2.94
Rebekah Hunker
16W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Carol Tse
46W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
Lisa Schneider
92W–87L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Alicia Cintron
197W–128L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Stephanie Balkin
110W–99L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Caitlin Chang
17W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Page
72W–94L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Patricia Coomaraswamy
65W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Nancy Aranow
66W–138L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Karen Arnett
28W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Leana Rahman
95W–83L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
2.65
3
Amy Listerman
41W–90L career · 6 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.47
2.5
Anna Fontana
12W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.25
Joan Lavin
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maureen Maitland
31W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Garcia
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.