Teams

West Orange

2023 40&Over Women · 4.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.40 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-16vs Green Knoll 2Won 21
L#1 DoublesKerri Delmonico / Alexandra Walter vs Amy Collins / Stacy Schiffman6-4, 2-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Favia / Erica Rosenberg vs Marji Scharf / Amy Hearn6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLily Riedel / Karen Wells vs Rika Sabinsky / Miell Yi6-1, 6-3
2023-06-09vs Green Knoll 1Won 31
L#1 DoublesErin Lepone / Samantha Schneider vs Kate Burke / Kimberly Rosenthal1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJaime Schechter vs Marilyn Liu4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAngelina Frankovic / Erica Rosenberg vs Melissa Hammer / Serena-G Xu6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Favia / Kerri Delmonico vs Paula Brotman / Margaret Toth6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2023-05-19vs Green Knoll 2Lost 03
L#1 SinglesMelissa McCarthy vs Jill Olman1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Wells / Robin Lieberman vs Natalia Londono Estrada / Miell Yi6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAllison Axenrod / Kimberly Derr vs Alida Martorell / Martha Land1-6, 1-6
2023-05-12vs Green Knoll 1Won 21
W#1 DoublesErin Lepone / Samantha Schneider vs Wendy Ledon / Marilyn Liu7-5, 4-2
L#1 SinglesJaime Schechter vs Sarah Tirone2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJoyce O'Brien / Erica Rosenberg vs Melissa Hammer / Susan Berntson6-1, 6-2
2023-04-28vs Green Knoll 2Won 21
L#1 SinglesJaime Schechter vs Amy Collins6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Wells / Angelina Frankovic vs Ashley Friedman / Natalia Londono Estrada6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAllison Axenrod / Kimberly Derr vs Alida Martorell / Martha Land7-5, 7-6
2023-04-21vs Green Knoll 1Won 31
W#1 DoublesErin Lepone / Samantha Schneider vs Kimberly Rosenthal / Melissa Hammer6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJaime Schechter vs Sarah Tirone4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Smith / Karen Wells vs Wendy Ledon / Marilyn Liu7-6, 0-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKerri Delmonico / Alexandra Walter vs Kate Burke / Susan Berntson6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1West Orange06141026203
2Green Knoll 206141027215
3Green Knoll 10681634231

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Karen Wells
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.33
Erin Lepone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.28
Lily Riedel
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Jaime Schechter
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Angelina Frankovic
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Allison Axenrod
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.10
Suzanne Favia
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.07
Robin Lieberman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.01
Erica Rosenberg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.94
Joyce O'Brien
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Melissa McCarthy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.82
Kimberly Derr
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
Alexandra Walter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Kerri Delmonico
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Samantha Schneider
published
Sarah Zakim
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angelina Frankovic + Erica Rosenberg6258% games+6.4% vs expected
Suzanne Favia + Erica Rosenberg8455% games+2.8% vs expected
Angelina Frankovic + Suzanne Favia6452% games−2.9% vs expected
Allison Axenrod + Lily Riedel7258% gamesnot enough data
Lily Riedel + Robin Lieberman404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Karen Wells
39W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
4.59
4.5
Erin Lepone
8W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Lily Riedel
154W–72L career · 9 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Jaime Schechter
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Angelina Frankovic
34W–23L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Allison Axenrod
44W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.11
4.5
Suzanne Favia
198W–131L career · 2 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
4.10
Robin Lieberman
39W–44L career · 3 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
4.07
4.5
Erica Rosenberg
51W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
4.01
Joyce O'Brien
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.94
Melissa McCarthy
114W–42L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Kimberly Derr
196W–64L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Alexandra Walter
35W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kerri Delmonico
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Samantha Schneider
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Zakim
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.