Teams

LCTA18T/Howle

USTA 18 & Over Tri-Level League · 3.0 3.5 4.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 3.5 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Brent Herlong
published 4
3.73
Tyler Statton
published
3.53
Travis Collins
published
3.44
Andrew Harmon
published 3.5
3.34
Shane Farrell
published
3.23
Steven Howle
published
3.18
John Ritenour
published
3.00
John Maize
published
2.74
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bryan Blankenship + John Ritenour9455% games−1.1% vs expected
John Maize + Andrew Harmon4163% gamesnot enough data
Tyler Statton + Brent Herlong404 matchesnot enough data
Bryan Blankenship + John Maize224 matchesnot enough data
Travis Collins + Steven Howle033 matchesnot enough data
John Ritenour + Andrew Harmon213 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Harmon + Brent Herlong303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brent Herlong
68W–44L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Tyler Statton
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Travis Collins
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Andrew Harmon
57W–24L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.44
Shane Farrell
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Steven Howle
33W–44L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
John Ritenour
45W–28L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
John Maize
89W–54L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Bryan Blankenship
44W–41L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.