Teams

N OR-MAC-Soot

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Heather Edwards
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.75
Anne Mangan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-06-17Won 10
W#1 SinglesHeather Edwards vs CHRISTINE McNair6-3, 6-1
2023-06-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesHeather Edwards vs Rosemarie Mannino6-2, 6-0
2023-06-03Won 10
W#1 SinglesHeather Edwards vs Sidney Clarke6-1, 6-1
2023-05-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesErin Dineen / Heather Edwards vs Trish Peters / Irina Stolerman7-6, 6-3
2023-05-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesAnne Mangan / Andria Shirk vs Rosemarie Mannino / Tammy Barker6-1, 6-0
2023-04-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMilenka Coltman / Anne Mangan vs April Razey / Michelle Eastburn-Larsen5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-22Won 20
W#1 SinglesHeather Edwards vs Sheila Amarga-Lee6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Mangan / Andria Shirk vs Heather Davidson / Jennifer Donohue7-5, 6-4
2023-04-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeather Edwards / Milenka Coltman vs Lynn Harrelson / Trish Peters6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Heather Edwards
95W–67L career · type A
2%98%0%
3.21
3
Anne Mangan
62W–74L career
6%91%4%
2.75

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.