Teams

KC-RH TEAL

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 2.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-29vs BM REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Jacquet / Lara Howe vs Ashley Olin / Dawn Fable6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesZenta Pakulis vs SARAH SPRATLEN6-0, 6-1
2024-05-24vs LEBTC NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Jacquet / Zenta Pakulis vs Rebecca Yao / Keri Hanson6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2024-05-15Won 10
W#1 SinglesZenta Pakulis vs Laura Hatch6-0, 6-2
2024-05-08vs SS-LGT GREENWon 20
W#1 SinglesZenta Pakulis vs Jillian Clark6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChristine Jacquet / Lisa Garcia vs Tara Cronin / Kelly Sengenberger1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-05-01vs BCST GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrea Shearer / Zenta Pakulis vs JILL KROOG / Cris Bowman-Harvey6-0, 6-2
2024-04-24vs KC-CC PINKLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Jacquet / Catherine Pinto vs Rachel Osborne / Courtney Gocha4-6, 4-6
2024-04-17vs HRCA-N GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Jacquet / Lara Howe vs Mollie Anderson / Sarah Hays4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Zenta Pakulis
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.93
Lisa Garcia
published
2.65
Nancy Meehan
published
2.62
Catherine Pinto
published 2.5
2.26
Christine Jacquet
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.15
Andrea Shearer
published 2.5
2.08
Kendra Curry
published
Lara Howe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kendra Curry + Lisa Garcia3551% games−17.6% vs expected
Christine Jacquet + Lisa Garcia1534% games−23.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Zenta Pakulis
78W–12L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.11
Lisa Garcia
15W–16L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
2.93
Nancy Meehan
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
2.65
2.5
Catherine Pinto
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%19%81%
2.62
2.5
Christine Jacquet
73W–81L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Andrea Shearer
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.15
Kendra Curry
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Lara Howe
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.