Teams

Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRC

2026 Combo 18 & Over 2.5, 6.5, 8.5, 10.5 · 6.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 9 12:00 AM
Summerhill Racquet Club
Sep 16 12:00 AM
Summerhill Racquet Club
Sep 30 12:00 AM
Summerhill Racquet Club
Oct 21 12:00 AM
Summerhill Racquet Club
Nov 4 12:00 AM
Matrix Racquet Club
2026-09-03vs Neal/Rogers/SVCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesBecca Bertram / Shannon Hendrix vs Sherry Fitzgerald / Michelle Kehoe1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Sahu / Tia Greaser vs Laurie Letts / Jill Marley2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesVictoria Gammill / Whitney Moore vs Melanie Neal / Cally Turner1-6, 2-6
2026-08-24vs Hradsky/Bentonville/MRCWon 21
L#1 DoublesMJ Schutz / Victoria Gammill vs Lauren Randall / Sophia Rosenfeld6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBecca Bertram / Tami Chrisman vs Laura Schmitt / Janis Harris6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShannon Hendrix / Samantha Thiede Erickson vs Clara Park / Melissa Smith6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hradsky/Bentonville/MRC000000
2Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRC000000
3Guido/Bentonville/IND000000
4Weber/Farmington/FAC000000
5Kurin-Kushmaul/Bentonville/MRC000000
6Liipfert-Beere/Bentonville/KTC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
MJ Schutz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Becca Bertram
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Samantha Thiede Erickson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Whitney Moore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Jamie Killingsworth
published
2.71
Tia Greaser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Victoria Gammill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Victoria Gammill + Whitney Moore213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

MJ Schutz
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
3
Becca Bertram
27W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Samantha Thiede Erickson
24W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%9%
2.82
Whitney Moore
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%9%
2.81
Jamie Killingsworth
9W–13L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Tia Greaser
17W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Victoria Gammill
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.