Teams

Team McNiece

2022 NOVA Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-02vs You can Kiss my AceLost 01
L#1 SinglesMarguerite McFadden vs Megan Sultan5-7, 4-4
2022-05-31vs You can Kiss my AceLost 01
L#2 DoublesOlga Minsky / Marguerite McFadden vs Rebecca Norman / Angela Tomaszewski3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-05-20vs You can Kiss my AceLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren McNeice / Nicole Lefton vs Genevieve Gilinger / Anne McDonald2-6, 4-6
2022-05-10vs You can Kiss my AceWon 10
W#1 SinglesMarguerite McFadden vs Niki Friedman6-4, 6-0
2022-05-03vs You can Kiss my AceSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKerry Purdy / Marguerite McFadden vs Niki Friedman / Christiane Lavin6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKaren McNeice / Gina Dell'Atti vs Katie Plofchan / Jacqueline Walker1-6, 0-6
2022-04-26vs You can Kiss my AceSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMarguerite McFadden vs Angela Tomaszewski6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKaren McNeice / Nicole Lefton vs Jacqueline Walker / Katie Plofchan2-6, 6-7
2022-04-12vs You can Kiss my AceSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMarguerite McFadden vs Christiane Lavin2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAmanda Kerr / Karen McNeice vs Julie Collier / Angela Tomaszewski6-1, 6-1
2022-04-05vs You can Kiss my AceLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaryn DeVito / Karen McNeice vs Niki Friedman / Lisa Furgal0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Amanda Kerr
published 4
3.44
Tara Reynolds
published
3.40
Karyn DeVito
published 3.5
3.28
Marguerite McFadden
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Jennifer Decker
published
2.98
Effie Hoffman
published 3
2.90
Olga Minsky
published
2.68
Sarah Matcher
published
2.56
Karen McNeice
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Kerry Purdy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marguerite McFadden + Karyn DeVito261653% games+1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Kerr
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
Tara Reynolds
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Karyn DeVito
141W–116L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Marguerite McFadden
95W–75L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Jennifer Decker
13W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Effie Hoffman
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
Olga Minsky
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
Sarah Matcher
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Karen McNeice
42W–55L career · 5 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
2.56
Kerry Purdy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.