Teams

1. July

2023 NO LEAGUE · ADMIN USE ONLY

22 players · average NTRP 3.39 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for ADMIN USE ONLY have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Eboni Lance
published 4.5
4.25
Barry Weiner
published 4.5
3.96
Jill Rose
published
3.85
Maria Scaler
published
3.46
Erin Newsome Moltz
published 3.5
3.37
Sung Cho
published
3.34
Elliot Rogers
published 3.5
3.27
GENA CHUNG
published 3.5
Eric Kruszewski
published 3.5
3.11
Brenda Crowe
published 3.5
3.08
Valerie Mockapetris
published 3.5
3.04
Eunice Winfree
published 3
2.97
Donna Jones
published 3
2.88
Seth Mann
published 3
2.81
Natalie Walker
published
2.78
Dana Dolvin
published 3
2.61
Jocelyn McDaniel
published
2.50
David Horetsky
published 3
Cathie Boarman
published 2.5
Kominh Thongphok
published
Liyan Liu
published
Thaddisa Fulwood
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sung Cho + GENA CHUNG0538% games−6.3% vs expected
Eboni Lance + Jill Rose213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eboni Lance
357W–214L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
4.38
4.5
Barry Weiner
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
4.25
Jill Rose
49W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.96
Maria Scaler
32W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
3.5
Erin Newsome Moltz
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
Sung Cho
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Elliot Rogers
18W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
GENA CHUNG
122W–132L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Eric Kruszewski
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Brenda Crowe
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Valerie Mockapetris
129W–104L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Eunice Winfree
80W–78L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Donna Jones
21W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Seth Mann
51W–92L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
Natalie Walker
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Dana Dolvin
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
Jocelyn McDaniel
49W–28L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.61
3
David Horetsky
37W–132L career · type A · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
2.50
2.5
Cathie Boarman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kominh Thongphok
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Liyan Liu
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thaddisa Fulwood
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.