Teams

KTAC-Russell/Engelhard

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.46 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-04-17vs GTC-Brawley-Cook Shot MakersWon 31
W#1 DoublesMika Russell / Naomi Kaneko vs Selina Lai / Carol Bricker6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesUyen Lee vs Diana Chan6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesVictoria Stanton / Leslie Waldman vs Carolyn Forbes / Ilene Anderson0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMauntrece Zamzow / Karen Fossum vs Katherine Steuart / Lyudmila Kunitsa7-6, 4-2
2021-04-11vs VAC-HerrickWon 31
W#1 DoublesMika Russell / Naomi Kaneko vs Janie Daray / Gretchen Gacetta6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKaren Fossum vs Debra Moody6-3, 5-3
L#2 DoublesLeslie Engelhard / Chris Stewart vs Kristen Case / Holly Brazel2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMauntrece Zamzow / Diane Koch vs Shelley Stern / Pamela Finn6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2021-04-03vs VAC-Hunter/Jones FireballsWon 31
W#1 DoublesMika Russell / Naomi Kaneko vs Kelley Hunter / Mary Ellen Jones6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKaren Fossum vs Carol Peebles6-3, 5-5
L#2 DoublesCarole Schaefer / Christine Cattell vs Arlene Hartman / Robin Stahley2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMauntrece Zamzow / Aileen Bergstrom vs Claudia Shanley / Cristina Stormans6-1, 6-4
2021-03-28vs JTC-ReevesLost 13
L#1 DoublesMika Russell / Carole Schaefer vs Geraldine Carlos / Myrna Alquiza4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKaren Fossum vs Shawli Hathaway6-4, 4-4
L#2 DoublesLeslie Engelhard / Diane Koch vs Penny Quinn / Pam Rasanen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChris Stewart / Victoria Stanton vs Liz VanDerschelden / Debbie Donovan2-6, 4-6
2021-03-20vs TLTC-ElofsonSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNaomi Kaneko / Mika Russell vs Lee Bowman / Teresa de Lorenzo6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKaren Fossum vs Amanda O'Halloran3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristine Cattell / Frances Shaw vs Micki Hulscher / Sara Simonson2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAileen Bergstrom / Leslie Engelhard vs Lori Girvin / Rosa Allen1-6, 2-6
2021-03-13vs VAC-ArnoldSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNaomi Kaneko / Chris Stewart vs Nancy Arnold / Jill Waters7-5, 5-5
W#1 SinglesUyen Lee vs Nancy Koeppen6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKaren Fossum / Carole Schaefer vs Janie Davis / Christine Nall7-6, 1-4
L#3 DoublesChristine Cattell / Frances Shaw vs Martha Maggi / Terri Murray6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Naomi Kaneko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.60
Uyen Lee
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.26
Victoria Stanton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Mika Russell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Karen Fossum
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.14
Mauntrece Zamzow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Aileen Bergstrom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Leslie Waldman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Chris Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Christine Cattell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Diane Koch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Leslie Engelhard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Carole Schaefer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Frances Shaw
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aileen Bergstrom + Mika Russell4253% games+13.7% vs expected
Karen Fossum + Uyen Lee4169% games+13.3% vs expected
Mika Russell + Naomi Kaneko15166% games+12.8% vs expected
Leslie Waldman + Victoria Stanton3653% games+1.2% vs expected
Uyen Lee + Victoria Stanton4358% games+1.2% vs expected
Karen Fossum + Mauntrece Zamzow4550% games−0.3% vs expected
Karen Fossum + Chris Stewart4550% games−2.4% vs expected
Frances Shaw + Christine Cattell0932% games−5.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Naomi Kaneko
34W–14L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Uyen Lee
168W–85L career · 2 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Victoria Stanton
66W–79L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Mika Russell
73W–50L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Karen Fossum
187W–175L career · 6 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Mauntrece Zamzow
29W–42L career · 3 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Aileen Bergstrom
72W–71L career · 2 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Leslie Waldman
54W–74L career · 1 line in 2021
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Chris Stewart
85W–102L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Christine Cattell
68W–95L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Diane Koch
16W–16L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Leslie Engelhard
49W–80L career · 3 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
2.60
Carole Schaefer
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Frances Shaw
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.