Teams

RLSAMUELS

2022 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 8.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-28vs ILIhlyWon 10
W#1 DoublesKimberley Matthews / Kim Camp vs Suzanne Brown / Donna Stieber6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-10-13Won 20
W#2 DoublesSusan Cook / Catherine Brawner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Procter / Kim Camp vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-07vs ILIhlySplit 11
W#2 DoublesKim Camp / Kimberley Matthews vs Lisa Ihly / Susan Doninger Greer6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLillian Poole / Catherine Brawner vs Susan Gustafson / Lisa Talton6-7, 1-6
2022-09-24vs MHoagWon 10
W#3 DoublesRebecca Procter / Ginger Shields vs Mary Hoag / Terry Dale4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-09-16vs ILIhlyLost 02
L#2 DoublesKim Camp / Kimberley Matthews vs Alice Stubbs / Suzanne Brown5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Samuels / Catherine Brawner vs Lisa Ihly / Kim McDonald2-6, 1-6
2022-09-02vs MHoagWon 10
W#2 DoublesKim Camp / Kimberley Matthews vs Marcia Fort / Susan Fekete6-3, 6-4
2022-08-26vs ILIhlyLost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Camp / Rebecca Procter vs Donna Stieber / Jayne Burton1-6, 1-6
2022-08-12vs MHoagWon 10
W#3 DoublesKim Camp / Kimberley Matthews vs Marti Crane / Diane Werner6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Kim Camp
published
3.63
Kimberley Matthews
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published 4
3.60
Catherine Brawner
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Lori Mayes
published
3.48
Rebecca Procter
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.33
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Brawner + Kimberley Matthews8255% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca Procter + Kimberley Matthews2647% gamesnot enough data
Catherine Brawner + Rebecca Procter303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Camp
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Kimberley Matthews
137W–107L career · 13 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Catherine Brawner
112W–94L career · 6 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Lori Mayes
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Rebecca Procter
185W–147L career · 10 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
4
Elizabeth Samuels
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
90%10%<1%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.