Teams

Khoo's team

Tri-Level League · Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men CENTRAL

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NEW JERSEY

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2018-10-20vs CM HackersLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaul Ricciardi / Jonathan Zhu vs Bryan Botsch / Goro Sakurai2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChanaka Amarasinghe / Dan Khoo vs Rajesh Pillai / Madhu Talupur6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2018-10-13vs 3 Fast 3 FuriousLost 03
L#1 DoublesJan Henderson / Hourad Afsar vs DAISUKE SUZUKI / Jon Rubinstein2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJonathan Zhu / Anthony Dolhon vs Ram Mohan Baskaran / Vivek Kumar4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Higgins / Alan Howard vs Nicholas McBride / Ryan Christopher1-6, 2-6
2018-09-29vs Mercer SlammersLost 02
L#1 DoublesJan Henderson / Paul Ricciardi vs Vivek Sahota / Rash Mahmood1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDan Khoo / Stephen Khoo vs Mani Maran / William Lester1-6, 1-6
2018-09-22vs Nassau TerminatorsWon 21
L#1 DoublesTyler Neal / Jaime Ramirez vs Peter Tilles / Peter James6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPaul Ricciardi / Chanaka Amarasinghe vs Colin Watts / Edward Kolb6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlan Howard / Daniel Higgins vs Alan Patten / Fred Mitchell6-4, 6-2
2018-09-22vs Team GladiatorsLost 02
L#1 DoublesTyler Neal / Jaime Ramirez vs Eduardo Ribeiro Ferreira / Jaishal PATEL3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Dragan / Anthony Dolhon vs Rafael Zamarripa / Asim Hafeez2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men CENTRAL
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
13 Fast 3 Furious601538109
2CM Hackers339922154
3Mercer Slammers2481024171
4Khoo's team1421326163
5Nassau Terminators1561225183

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Tyler Neal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Chanaka Amarasinghe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Dan Khoo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Alan Howard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Daniel Higgins
published 3.5
Anthony Dolhon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
BERNAL STEWART
published
Hourad Afsar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jaime Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jan Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Dragan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jonathan Zhu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Paul Ricciardi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Stephen Khoo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Bishop
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Bishop + Jan Henderson044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tyler Neal
45W–27L career · 2 lines in 2019
56%44%<1%
3.98
4
Chanaka Amarasinghe
178W–143L career · 2 lines in 2019
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Dan Khoo
143W–143L career · 2 lines in 2019
12%87%1%
3.67
3.5
Alan Howard
45W–36L career · 2 lines in 2019
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Daniel Higgins
48W–32L career · no lines in 2019
not enough data
Anthony Dolhon
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2019
not enough data
BERNAL STEWART
0W–4L career · no lines in 2019
not enough data
Hourad Afsar
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2019
not enough data
Jaime Ramirez
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2019
not enough data
Jan Henderson
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2019
not enough data
John Dragan
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2019
not enough data
Jonathan Zhu
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2019
not enough data
Paul Ricciardi
34W–43L career · 3 lines in 2019
not enough data
Stephen Khoo
18W–24L career · 1 line in 2019
not enough data
Thomas Bishop
18W–30L career · no lines in 2019
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.