Teams

Woods (65+ 7.0)

2024 Adult 65 & Over · Men 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-01vs STL/Rhoads/65+Over 7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesDon Smith / Jerry Edsen vs William Dannevik / Michael Souders2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJames Boone / Barry Sage vs Kevin Mowery / John Schless4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCharles Becker / William Woods vs David Osborn / Bob Jurczyk6-1, 6-2
2024-03-25vs STL/Rhoads/65+Over 7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesLarman Williams / Don Smith vs Jay Campbell / John Schless3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Kinsella / Barry Sage vs Michael Souders / William Dannevik0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesThomas Matthews / William Woods vs Peter Albrecht / Tom Rhoads6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-18vs STL/Rhoads/65+Over 7.0MWon 21
W#1 DoublesBill Biernacki / Larry Shireman vs Darwin Haskins / John McGowan6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDon Smith / Larman Williams vs Tom Rhoads / Robert Faust6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJames Boone / John Kinsella vs Kevin Mowery / David Osborn2-6, 4-6
2024-03-11vs STL/Rhoads/65+Over 7.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesJerry Edsen / Bill Biernacki vs William Dannevik / Charles Schultz2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharles Becker / Larman Williams vs Jay Campbell / John Schless3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesThomas Matthews / Barry Sage vs Peter Albrecht / Tom Rhoads6-2, 3-5, 0-1
2024-03-04vs STL/Rhoads/65+Over 7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesLarry Shireman / Larry Swedroe vs Darwin Haskins / John Schless6-1, 5-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDon Smith / Larman Williams vs Charles Schultz / John McGowan6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCharles Becker / William Woods vs Jay Campbell / Bob Jurczyk5-7, 2-6
2024-02-19vs STL/Rhoads/65+Over 7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesJerry Edsen / Larry Shireman vs John McGowan / Kevin Mowery7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Kinsella / James Boone vs Tom Rhoads / Robert Faust2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLarry Swedroe / Thomas Matthews vs Steve Orlich / Michael Souders6-1
2024-02-12vs STL/Rhoads/65+Over 7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesBill Biernacki / Barry Sage vs William Dannevik / Charles Schultz4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLarman Williams / Don Smith vs Robert Faust / Rick Sutton6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLarry Swedroe / Charles Becker vs Kevin Mowery / David Osborn7-6, 3-4, 0-1
2024-02-05vs STL/Rhoads/65+Over 7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesLarry Shireman / James Boone vs John Schless / Darwin Haskins6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Matthews / William Woods vs Jay Campbell / Kevin Mowery2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLarry Swedroe / Charles Becker vs Peter Albrecht / Rick Sutton4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STL/Rhoads/65+Over 7.0M7116822209
2Woods (65+ 7.0)1781634225

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Jerry Edsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Larry Shireman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Bill Biernacki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Charles Becker
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.05
Larman Williams
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.02
James Boone
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.83
Barry Sage
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
John Kinsella
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Larry Swedroe
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Thomas Matthews
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
William Woods
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jerry Edsen + James Boone12554% games−3.0% vs expected
Larry Shireman + Charles Becker2342% games−4.2% vs expected
Charles Becker + Larman Williams1542% gamesnot enough data
William Woods + Larry Swedroe3244% gamesnot enough data
John Kinsella + James Boone134 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Matthews + William Woods033 matchesnot enough data
Larry Shireman + Bill Biernacki213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jerry Edsen
43W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Larry Shireman
70W–78L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Bill Biernacki
44W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Charles Becker
37W–73L career · 5 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
Larman Williams
9W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
James Boone
31W–52L career · 4 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Barry Sage
18W–67L career · 4 lines in 2024
89%11%<1%
2.83
John Kinsella
20W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Larry Swedroe
14W–36L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Matthews
2W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
William Woods
44W–71L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.