Teams

6-SLantry-Eno

2023 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 8.5 Women Evening

11 players · average NTRP 4.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-03vs 5-JRoss-EnoWon 20
W#2 DoublesMiranda Harmon / Lisa Spees vs McKinsey Blount / Morgan Blount6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKyrsten Le / Ana Plachco vs Emily Johnson / Hannah Silverstein6-3, 6-4
2023-09-28vs 1-LBolger-EnoWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatherine Leib / Sindhu Shivaji vs Rachel Davis / Sarah Shelby7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLisa Spees / Deborah Howard vs Nannette Goodwin / Carey Baddour4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJane Williams / Ana Plachco vs Stacey Burkert / Lauren Bolger6-4, 6-3
2023-09-21Won 30
W#1 DoublesAna Plachco / Miranda Harmon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDeborah Howard / Sindhu Shivaji vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBarbara Timinskas / Jane Williams vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-14vs 3-LRupert/ATomkins-Eno 8.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Timinskas / Lisa Spees vs Anna Tomkins / Toni Laney3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSindhu Shivaji / Miranda Harmon vs Elizabeth Heald / Paula Collado Cordon2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJane Williams / Deborah Howard vs Lynsey Easley / Kristin Lahey4-6, 2-6
2023-08-31vs 4-LPetree-UNCLost 01
L#2 DoublesJane Williams / Ana Plachco vs Elizabeth Petree / Jill Anderson1-6, 2-6
2023-08-22vs 5-JRoss-EnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesAna Plachco / Barbara Timinskas vs Tanya Sirivolu / Liza Sisler6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJane Williams / Sindhu Shivaji vs Maureen Sredl / Jamie Harford6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2023-08-08vs 3-LRupert/ATomkins-Eno 8.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAna Plachco / Jane Williams vs Anna Tomkins / Bren Woods0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Timinskas / Kristen Howering vs Amelia Blankenship / Emily Tinervin0-6, 1-6
2023-08-03vs 7-ELinnander-SVC 8.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesKatherine Leib / Jane Williams vs Tiffany Langino / Suyeon Kim1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Spees / Deborah Howard vs Erika Linnander / Melissa Coward7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 8.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Lisa Spees
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.11
Sara Barfield
published
4.02
Katherine Leib
published
3.95
Ana Plachco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.90
Sindhu Shivaji
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.78
Kyrsten Le
published
3.66
Barbara Timinskas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Miranda Harmon
published
3.60
Jane Williams
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.48
Emily Culbreth
published
Kristen Howering
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Plachco + Barbara Timinskas5850% games−2.0% vs expected
Ana Plachco + Jane Williams3636% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Timinskas + Jane Williams3258% gamesnot enough data
Ana Plachco + Lisa Spees404 matchesnot enough data
Miranda Harmon + Jane Williams044 matchesnot enough data
Jane Williams + Lisa Spees314 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Timinskas + Lisa Spees123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lisa Spees
97W–62L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
4.32
Sara Barfield
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
4.11
Katherine Leib
24W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
4.02
4.5
Ana Plachco
150W–120L career · 6 lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.95
4
Sindhu Shivaji
73W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.90
Kyrsten Le
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.78
4
Barbara Timinskas
80W–79L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Miranda Harmon
21W–19L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Jane Williams
306W–299L career · 7 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Emily Culbreth
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.48
Kristen Howering
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.