Teams

8 Hermitage Hardesty

2021 Richmond Combo Weekend · Combo Women 6.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.57 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Combo Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
AMY LINES
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
Betsy Kersey
published 4
3.38
Stephanie Yablonski
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.34
Brittany Nichols
published 3.5
3.31
ANJA BAUGH
published 3.5
3.29
Sarah Martin
published
3.10
Amy Click
published 3.5
3.02
Renee Fisher
published
3.01
Kirsten Knull
published
2.66
Kim Magnano
published
Monica Walsh
published
Susan Mangin
published
Tissa Nasta
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Yablonski + AMY LINES18170% games+20.2% vs expected
Sarah Martin + Renee Fisher213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
AMY LINES
220W–87L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Betsy Kersey
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Stephanie Yablonski
124W–88L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Brittany Nichols
14W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
ANJA BAUGH
13W–17L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Sarah Martin
15W–8L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Amy Click
1W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
Renee Fisher
4W–11L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.02
Kirsten Knull
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Elizabeth Jurkuta
6W–17L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
2.66
Kim Magnano
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Monica Walsh
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Mangin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tissa Nasta
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.