Teams

Binghamton

Women's Inter-Region League · 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.20 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-27vs RochesterWon 21
W#1 DoublesSue Burns / Emily Madan vs Jing Zhang / Liping Jia6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPrab Pannu / Kim Yuhnick vs Jennifer Ponce / Lisa McConnell6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMindy Swails / Laurie Keller vs Yulia Nedelko / Joan Aiello2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-10-19vs SyracuseLost 12
W#1 DoublesSue Burns / Emily Madan vs Heather Vallet / Karen Snyder7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGina Callahan / JENNIFER WEGMANN vs Leah Marinelli / Alyssa Calenzo3-6, 5-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Martino / Dickey Sopchak vs Rajani Day / Karlene Pascarella1-6, 2-6
2024-10-06vs RochesterWon 21
W#1 DoublesMindy Swails / Emily Madan vs Beth Klintworth / Jennifer Ponce6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPrab Pannu / Rebecca Martino vs Yulia Nedelko / Nicole Tschiderer5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDickey Sopchak / Janet Cady vs Joan Aiello / Jing Zhang4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-01vs SyracuseWon 30
W#1 DoublesMindy Swails / Laurie Keller vs Valerie Clarke / Andrea Elliott4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSue Burns / Kim Yuhnick vs Rajani Day / Karlene Pascarella7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJanet Cady / Rebecca Martino vs Llaurie Kushner / Jean Sabourin6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Binghamton318411106
2Rochester226615118
3Syracuse134816122

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Emily Madan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Prab Pannu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
JENNIFER WEGMANN
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Kim Yuhnick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Sue Burns
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Patricia Noel
published
2.86
Janet Cady
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Dickey Sopchak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Gina Callahan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Laurie Keller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mindy Swails
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Rebecca Martino
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sarah Lowenstein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Cady + Laurie Keller5077% games+10.6% vs expected
Prab Pannu + Sue Burns5459% games+8.3% vs expected
Prab Pannu + Sarah Lowenstein5751% games+4.7% vs expected
Gina Callahan + JENNIFER WEGMANN6649% games+4.6% vs expected
Sue Burns + Sarah Lowenstein3737% games−1.1% vs expected
Mindy Swails + Laurie Keller2351% games−6.1% vs expected
Sue Burns + Mindy Swails404 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Keller + Sarah Lowenstein404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily Madan
132W–60L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.58
Prab Pannu
70W–70L career · 2 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
JENNIFER WEGMANN
15W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.05
3.5
Kim Yuhnick
72W–75L career · 2 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.98
Sue Burns
115W–92L career · 3 lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
2.97
Patricia Noel
19W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
Janet Cady
20W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
>99%<1%0%
2.86
3
Dickey Sopchak
3W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Gina Callahan
27W–41L career · 1 line in 2024
23%76%<1%
2.59
Laurie Keller
24W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mindy Swails
11W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rebecca Martino
19W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Lowenstein
34W–38L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.