Teams

TOC.Clancey

2022 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 7.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-10-01vs CAS.TabelonWon 21
W#1 DoublesDaniel Shields / Dirk German vs Paul Wiegand / Kevin Boese7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBert Clancey / Rodney Lohman vs Robert Johnson / Morten Pedersen6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLawrence Brock / Preston Waldo vs Jeffrey Tabelon / Tom Roeder6-1, 6-4
2022-09-25vs PW.ColeyWon 10
W#1 DoublesLawrence Brock / Preston Waldo vs Julio Perez / Jamie Thompson7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2022-09-17vs TOC.MerckWon 20
W#1 DoublesLawrence Brock / Daniel Shields vs Eli Jerchower / Tim Cavanaugh6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRodney Lohman / Mitch Strobin vs Charles Farmer / David Corcoran6-4, 7-6
2022-09-01vs TOC.RaghavanLost 02
L#1 DoublesLawrence Brock / Preston Waldo vs Amit Kumar / Praveen Krishnamurthy4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMiguel Materin / Mitch Strobin vs UTPAL JADIA / Rahul Narang3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 40 & Over 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Lawrence Brock
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Andrew Tate
published 4
3.78
Preston Waldo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Dirk German
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Mitch Strobin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Bert Clancey
published 3.5
2.91
Rodney Lohman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Miguel Materin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Tate + Preston Waldo6256% games+1.1% vs expected
Lawrence Brock + Preston Waldo6164% gamesnot enough data
Rodney Lohman + Lawrence Brock123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lawrence Brock
326W–122L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Andrew Tate
17W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Preston Waldo
145W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Dirk German
96W–68L career · 1 line in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Mitch Strobin
124W–70L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Bert Clancey
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Rodney Lohman
81W–100L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
Miguel Materin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.