Teams

OC LLW Boot Camp - FVTC - Tran

2022 OC Tri-Level Mixed · WE 4.5 - 4.0 - 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 4.09 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-11-10vs OC Tennis Addicts- FVTC- Tommy LeWon 10
W#3 DoublesKristen Petrovacki / Jesse Wu vs Sally Scott / Alin Curtean5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-10-23Won 20
W#1 DoublesFrank Tran / Tai Sisson vs Stephanie Chung / Son Nguyen6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKristen Petrovacki / Jesse Wu vs Pin Hong / Amit Patel6-1, 6-1
2022-10-09vs OC Tennis Addicts- FVTC- Tommy LeWon 10
W#1 DoublesFrank Tran / Tai Sisson vs Hatien Nguyen / Anil Vootkur6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WE 4.5 - 4.0 - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.76
Lawrence Yiang
published
4.68
Karen Trinh
published
4.46
Jinna Johnson
published
4.38
Gloria Yip
published 4.5
4.35
Tai Sisson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Chloe Kishel
published 4.5
4.03
Frank Tran
published 4.5
3.97
Katie Huyen
published 4
3.94
Kristen Petrovacki
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Tajoe Lun
published
3.79
Giao Do
published 4
3.77
Daniel Siow
published 4
Eugene Nguyen
published 4
3.50
Jesse Wu
published
3.42
Anh Vo
published 3.5
3.34
Jenniffer Wong
published 3.5
Jenny Tsai
published
Kimberly Buchan
published
Tyrone Wang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Trinh + Lawrence Yiang2346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lawrence Yiang
9W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.76
Karen Trinh
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
4.68
Jinna Johnson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
4.46
4.5
Gloria Yip
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Tai Sisson
249W–74L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Chloe Kishel
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Frank Tran
10W–16L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
4.03
4
Katie Huyen
90W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Kristen Petrovacki
134W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.94
Tajoe Lun
13W–5L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
3.80
4
Giao Do
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Daniel Siow
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Eugene Nguyen
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jesse Wu
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Anh Vo
15W–3L career · type M · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Jenniffer Wong
200W–169L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
Jenny Tsai
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberly Buchan
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tyrone Wang
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.