Teams

CROWN PINK

2022 CTA TWILIGHT - ASPEN · MOUNTAINS

10 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-12vs CROWN REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesBess Hammer / KA Gutner vs Colleen Barill / Kara Lizotte1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Garrigus / Megan Vrono vs Diana Ray / Stephanie Hayes0-6, 0-6
2022-10-05vs BASALTLost 03
L#1 DoublesRichlyn Pavcek / Jennifer Parker vs Brooke Stott / Molly Jones0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNancy Garrigus vs Lauren Noble1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Vrono / Bess Hammer vs Meghan Pearlman / Lauren Raymond6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2022-09-27vs RVRLost 12
L#1 DoublesBess Hammer / Megan Vrono vs Zoe Herreid / Audrey Imhoff0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesTatum Rees vs Katie Karow6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRichlyn Pavcek / Sharon Quittner vs Karen Fullerton / Danielle King1-6, 1-6
2022-09-14vs GSCC PURPLELost 03
L#1 DoublesTatum Rees / Richlyn Pavcek vs Susie Demers / Kate Leibinger4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSharon Quittner vs Keely Eberly2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKA Gutner / Jennifer Parker vs Anna Lorenson / Briar Schreiber1-6, 2-6
2022-08-31vs ASPTC GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesMegan Vrono / Lynzie Wagoner vs TONI COURTENAY / Melissa Wilkinson6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTatum Rees vs Julie Ernst6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRichlyn Pavcek / Nancy Garrigus vs Cynthia Helm / Walker Simmons3-6, 4-6
2022-08-24vs SMGLRSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Parker / Nancy Garrigus vs Emery Holton / Betsy Black2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Vrono / Tatum Rees vs Katherine Benziger / Jackie Kaplan7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · MOUNTAINS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CROWN RED5315923186
2GSCC PURPLE44101431233
3SMGLR4491532216
4CROWN PINK1641734222
5ASPTC GREEN1781635256

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Tatum Rees
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Colleen Barill
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.63
Richlyn Pavcek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.44
Nancy Garrigus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Bess Hammer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Jennifer Parker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
KA Gutner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lynzie Wagoner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Vrono
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Sharon Quittner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richlyn Pavcek + Colleen Barill1441% gamesnot enough data
Richlyn Pavcek + Nancy Garrigus3249% gamesnot enough data
Richlyn Pavcek + Tatum Rees224 matchesnot enough data
Richlyn Pavcek + Megan Vrono303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tatum Rees
23W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
3
Colleen Barill
58W–20L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
Richlyn Pavcek
47W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
Nancy Garrigus
30W–24L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%68%32%
2.44
2.5
Bess Hammer
1W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Parker
4W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
KA Gutner
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynzie Wagoner
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Megan Vrono
17W–5L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharon Quittner
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.