Teams

GTC RED

2023 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 9.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-02vs DTC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesRachael Costain / W Hancock vs Michelle Miller / Paul Robbertz1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Ringelman / Ty Bartels vs Derek Since / Susie Kokoska1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTonya Laden / Paul Barrow vs Heather Reimann / David Bowman5-7, 6-7
2023-06-25vs BVP REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesRachel Heise / JD Ready vs Meng Lian / Megan Melucci7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKC Nettleton / Craig Stromberg vs Philip Dixon-Patterson / Michelle Campbell6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesW Hancock / Michelle Degitis vs Tomas Mendez / Mary Nelson6-2, 6-4
2023-06-18vs LTA-Q REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesJD Ready / Rachael Costain vs Michelle Mathiesen / Alex Le1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Stromberg / Tonya Laden vs Keaton Howe / Suzanne Hale5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Degitis / W Hancock vs Alex Pedersen / Emily Pedersen0-6, 3-6
2023-06-14vs GTC GOLDLost 03
L#1 DoublesJD Ready / Rachel Heise vs Katherine Nicolson / Miles Doane2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaul Barrow / Tonya Laden vs Jenny Wiens / Mustafa Neemuchwala2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRachael Costain / Marc Costain vs Bryan Nykerk / Lissa Moon6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-06-04vs JCC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesJD Ready / Rachel Heise vs Jeff Crosley / Irina Suyumova2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKC Nettleton / Ty Bartels vs Christa Dobbs / Brian Nelson1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPaul Barrow / Tonya Laden vs Michelle Topf / Oliver McKinstry2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-28vs DTC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesRachel Heise / JD Ready vs Michelle Miller / Chris Swank5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesW Hancock / KC Nettleton vs Derek Since / Susie Kokoska3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Ringelman / Ty Bartels vs Jennifer Mele / David Bowman1-5
2023-05-22vs BVP REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Degitis / Craig Stromberg vs Deborah Freischlag / W Peter Freischlag6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaul Barrow / Tonya Laden vs Tomas Mendez / Mary Nelson6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRachael Costain / Marc Costain vs Dorothy Monroe / Meng Lian3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · MIXED 9.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GTC GOLD6116516163
2SS-H ORANGE5112617148
3LTA-Q RED5216514142
4JCC RED5213818153
5RRTC BLUE3310820167
6GTC RED2571430199
7BVP RED0712040245

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
KC Nettleton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.27
Michelle Degitis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Rachael Costain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.23
JD Ready
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 4.5
4.16
W Hancock
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.08
Tonya Laden
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.98
Rachel Heise
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Craig Stromberg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Paul Barrow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Heather Ringelman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Ty Bartels
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Marc Costain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tonya Laden + Craig Stromberg4158% games+5.7% vs expected
W Hancock + Michelle Degitis4253% games−0.4% vs expected
Tonya Laden + Paul Barrow102544% games−5.9% vs expected
Rachel Heise + JD Ready6745% games−9.2% vs expected
Rachael Costain + Marc Costain0634% games−10.2% vs expected
Ty Bartels + Heather Ringelman42133% games−18.1% vs expected
Michelle Degitis + Craig Stromberg2547% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
KC Nettleton
66W–71L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
4.43
4.5
Michelle Degitis
108W–54L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Rachael Costain
27W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
JD Ready
119W–116L career · 9 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
W Hancock
44W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Tonya Laden
91W–85L career · 5 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
4.08
Rachel Heise
43W–64L career · 4 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
Craig Stromberg
93W–70L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
Paul Barrow
40W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Heather Ringelman
9W–47L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ty Bartels
16W–64L career · 3 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
Marc Costain
4W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.