Teams

BH - Steed

2024 B'ham Winter Weekend - Adult 18 & Over Women · 4.0 Women Saturday 1:30 pm

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-02vs PRC - Bradley/MeredithWon 10
W#3 DoublesHolly Sherrer / Angie Blaising vs Stacey Bradley / Kyndall Spooner Robbins6-4, 6-4
2024-02-25vs MB Y - Misner/JonesLost 01
L#2 DoublesHolly Sherrer / Angie Blaising vs Anne Matthews / KC Templeton6-1, 0-6, 0-1
2024-02-24vs West Homewood - PetrellaWon 20
W#1 SinglesAngie Blaising vs Michelle Coxwell6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Keene / Holly Sherrer vs Katie Petrella / Amy Benson6-2, 6-3
2024-02-03vs West Homewood - Karst/MorganWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Steed / Angie Blaising vs Taylor Guthans / Zandra Leverett6-2, 6-2
2024-01-21vs Riverchase - McIntosh/HoltWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Steed / Angie Blaising vs Gina McIntosh / Joni Holt7-6, 7-5
2024-01-07vs Lifetime - TaylorLost 01
L#1 SinglesHolly Sherrer vs Jennifer Hemstreet6-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Saturday 1:30 pm have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Holly Sherrer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.97
Anastasia Payne
published 4
3.92
Angie Blaising
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.87
Tracy Strickland
published
3.78
Linda Sink
published
3.77
Debbie Drake
published 4
3.73
Karen Keene
published
3.72
Deanna Carroll
published 4
3.70
Karly Trent
published
3.65
Dianna Clifton
published 4
3.52
Leslie Housman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Sherrer + Angie Blaising18860% games+4.5% vs expected
Debbie Drake + Dianna Clifton11454% games−1.0% vs expected
Linda Sink + Deanna Carroll314 matchesnot enough data
Anastasia Payne + Linda Sink303 matchesnot enough data
Anastasia Payne + Tracy Strickland123 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Strickland + Karly Trent213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Holly Sherrer
114W–50L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
4.05
4
Anastasia Payne
20W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.97
4
Angie Blaising
83W–56L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%72%27%
3.92
Tracy Strickland
22W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.87
Linda Sink
16W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Debbie Drake
23W–18L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Karen Keene
28W–9L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Deanna Carroll
26W–9L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Karly Trent
22W–22L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Dianna Clifton
26W–24L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
Leslie Housman
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.