Teams

Ca.Conzola55C6.5

2025 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.19 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-10-09vs An.Ashburn55CWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Kempf / Bryan Kern vs Vicki Fritsch / Cynthia White7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristine Reinke / Julie Liddle vs Ann Ashburn / Rachel Pisciotta6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPhoebe Hill / Jan Copeland vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-02vs Di.Williams55CWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarie Gelston / Laura Munster vs Elisebeth Gelardi / Diane Williams6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCamille Conzola / Myra Peterson vs Melissa Hill / Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-09-25vs Sh.Cole55CLost 12
L#1 DoublesBryan Kern / Lisa Kempf vs Marylou Salmon / Sharon Lambe3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSara Wilhelmy / Myra Peterson vs Gwen Noble / Vickie Fuller6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPhoebe Hill / Suzanne Ruggles vs Leslie Damiano / Janet Hammond7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-09-11vs Pa.Cochran55CWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristine Reinke / Suzanne Ruggles vs Sarah Bell / Mary Ann Enzweiler6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCamille Conzola / Hope Graney vs Lisa Lathram / Cathy Williams6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarie Gelston / Phoebe Hill vs Judy Colby / Karen Wakeford7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-04vs We.Sielaty55CLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Liddle / Laura Munster vs Tracy Lowrance / Jennifer Brock6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSara Wilhelmy / Hope Graney vs Jill Salstrand / Jennifer Wolborsky1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMinh NguyenLe / Phoebe Hill vs Mary Strothmann / Norma Wolcott2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-28vs An.Ashburn55CWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Munster / Bryan Kern vs Lori Bourne / Chandler Bastian2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCamille Conzola / Myra Peterson vs Deanna Drescher / Ann Ashburn7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHope Graney / Julie Liddle vs Jennifer Fogleman / Jill Cramer1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-08-26vs Pa.Cochran55CWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristine Reinke / Julie Liddle vs Lisa Lathram / Diane Burnette6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Munster / Myra Peterson vs Paula Cochran / Mary Ann Enzweiler6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCamille Conzola / Hope Graney vs Karen Wakeford / Christine Mccorquodale6-4, 6-4
2025-08-21vs Di.Williams55CWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristine Reinke / Suzanne Ruggles vs Leslie Mahan / Tina Parker6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJan Copeland / Lisa Kempf vs India Pleasants / Millie Rushton6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCamille Conzola / Marie Gelston vs Laurie Reiss / Diane Williams7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-08-14vs Sh.Cole55CWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Kempf / Myra Peterson vs Sharon Cole / Sharon Lambe2-4
W#2 DoublesLaura Munster / Marie Gelston vs Kelly Huffstetler / Julee Knight6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMinh NguyenLe / Sara Wilhelmy vs Pamela Pitre / Jodi Zorzi6-3, 6-4
2025-07-31vs We.Sielaty55CWon 21
L#1 DoublesMinh NguyenLe / Sara Wilhelmy vs Jennifer Brock / Tracy Lowrance1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Reinke / Suzanne Ruggles vs Teri O'Neill / Mary Strothmann6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCamille Conzola / Jan Copeland vs Wendy Christensen / Norma Wolcott6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Christine Reinke
published 3.5
3.39
Lisa Kempf
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.36
Camille Conzola
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Laura Munster
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Minh NguyenLe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.05
Julie Liddle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.02
Sara Wilhelmy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
Marie Gelston
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.95
Hope Graney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Suzanne Ruggles
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Bryan Kern
published 3
2.83
Myra Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.81
Jan Copeland
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Phoebe Hill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Liddle + Camille Conzola9553% games+6.3% vs expected
Camille Conzola + Hope Graney211156% games+0.3% vs expected
Camille Conzola + Lisa Kempf6552% games−0.8% vs expected
Myra Peterson + Lisa Kempf183047% games−3.5% vs expected
Lisa Kempf + Laura Munster4256% games−3.7% vs expected
Julie Liddle + Hope Graney131149% games−6.4% vs expected
Myra Peterson + Suzanne Ruggles7448% games−8.0% vs expected
Minh NguyenLe + Julie Liddle4354% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christine Reinke
49W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Lisa Kempf
367W–302L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Camille Conzola
258W–178L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Laura Munster
49W–60L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3
Minh NguyenLe
42W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.08
3
Julie Liddle
216W–150L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.05
3.5
Sara Wilhelmy
60W–66L career · 4 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Marie Gelston
215W–161L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Hope Graney
169W–114L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Suzanne Ruggles
184W–162L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Bryan Kern
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Myra Peterson
170W–141L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Jan Copeland
112W–89L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Phoebe Hill
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.