Teams

Zhang/Nashville

2026 Mixed 55 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Mixed - Saturday

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-25vs Payne/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesJerry Zhang / Caroline Browder vs Matt McCord / Liz Daney5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGirish Hiremath / Leena Choi vs Eric Howser / Renee Adams7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-11vs Davis/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesCaroline Browder / Mark Rosenthal vs Cathy Radig / Cameron Crain7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKathleen Malchow / Rod Baine vs Connie Pearce / Jeff Mullins6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Frantz / Scott Welch vs Sarah Griffin / Craig Kanwischer6-3, 6-0
2026-06-27vs Payne/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesJerry Zhang / Leena Choi vs Ryan Cluff / Renee Adams6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesScott Welch / Michelle Deng vs Shannon Fox / Jeff Ammerman4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Cox / Rod Baine vs Kit Ramsay / Matt McCord6-2, 6-3
2026-06-15vs Davis/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesGirish Hiremath / Kathleen Malchow vs Tricia Davis / Cameron Crain6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesXianghu Qu / Donna Cox vs Jeff Mullins / Cathy Radig6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMark Rosenthal / Caroline Browder vs David Schilling / Paige Mullen6-2, 6-4
2026-06-06vs Payne/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesMike Gilles / Ann Frantz vs Jeff Ammerman / Shannon Fox6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGirish Hiremath / Leena Choi vs Matt McCord / Liz Daney7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJerry Zhang / Michelle Deng vs Eric Howser / Renee Adams7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed - Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Kathleen Malchow
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Scott Welch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Rod Baine
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Ann Frantz
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Girish Hiremath
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Mark Rosenthal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Leena Choi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Caroline Browder
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Xianghu Qu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Michelle Deng
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Malchow
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.70
Scott Welch
38W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
Rod Baine
23W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Ann Frantz
17W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Girish Hiremath
8W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Mark Rosenthal
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Leena Choi
16W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Caroline Browder
32W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
Xianghu Qu
14W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
9%91%1%
3.18
Michelle Deng
15W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.