Teams

SB-LLW-Unstrung-Beth Ford

SoCal Doubles League - SB Fall 2021 · SB - Women Doubles - 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-12-12vs SBTC-Volley GirlsLost 01
L#2 DoublesAbigail Galyon / Yang Ja Ballard vs Hannah Meyer / Monica Kunz5-7, 6-7
2021-11-21vs Elings-Spanks a LotLost 01
L#3 DoublesCindy Steffen / Beverly Aronson vs Nina Gustason / Joann Hollingshead3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-11-14vs Alisal-Hot ShotsWon 10
W#3 DoublesNina Quattrocchi / Beverly Aronson vs Stella Hahn / Roxanne Clare6-4, 6-3
2021-11-07vs SBTC-Volley GirlsWon 21
L#1 DoublesDyanne Wipf / Beverly Aronson vs Karen Suzuki / Hannah Meyer3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesYang Ja Ballard / Amy Sagraves vs Michelle Fitzpatrick / Kersten Barr6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBeth Ford / Michelle Seagraves vs Jill Crang / Ramona Weinstein6-0, 7-5
2021-10-31vs Elings-Spanks a LotLost 01
L#3 DoublesCindy Steffen / Beverly Aronson vs Nina Gustason / Kelly Jensen4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-10-24vs Alisal-Hot ShotsLost 02
L#2 DoublesYang Ja Ballard / Beverly Aronson vs Stella Hahn / Rosemary Talmadge3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNina Quattrocchi / Cindy Steffen vs Naomi Eskenazi / Sara Oshaughnessy4-6, 2-6
2021-10-17vs SBTC-Volley GirlsLost 01
L#3 DoublesNina Quattrocchi / Michelle Seagraves vs Wendy Gronsky / Bethany Anderson2-6, 3-6
2021-10-03vs Elings-Spanks a LotWon 10
W#3 DoublesAbigail Galyon / Yang Ja Ballard vs Nina Gustason / Jeanelle Posch7-5, 6-1
2021-09-19vs Alisal-Hot ShotsWon 10
W#3 DoublesBeverly Aronson / Yang Ja Ballard vs Naomi Eskenazi / Stella Hahn6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB - Women Doubles - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Erica Downing
published 4.5
4.01
Beth Ford
published 4
3.94
Dyanne Wipf
published 4
3.91
Yang Ja Ballard
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
Amy Sagraves
published 4
3.74
Beverly Aronson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.49
Michelle Seagraves
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Catherine Gill
published 4
3.26
Cindy Steffen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Gill + Beth Ford5166% games+15.3% vs expected
Beth Ford + Yang Ja Ballard16364% games+4.2% vs expected
Michelle Seagraves + Yang Ja Ballard7252% games+1.2% vs expected
Beverly Aronson + Yang Ja Ballard5254% gamesnot enough data
Beth Ford + Dyanne Wipf314 matchesnot enough data
Beth Ford + Amy Sagraves404 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Steffen + Beverly Aronson224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Seagraves + Beth Ford213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Erica Downing
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Beth Ford
89W–28L career · no lines in 2021
<1%47%53%
4.01
4
Dyanne Wipf
12W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Yang Ja Ballard
137W–73L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Amy Sagraves
10W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Beverly Aronson
111W–106L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Michelle Seagraves
41W–15L career · type S · 2 lines in 2021
53%47%<1%
3.49
4
Catherine Gill
29W–15L career · no lines in 2021
72%28%<1%
3.42
3.5
Cindy Steffen
56W–70L career · 12 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.