Teams

WNCA Nichols (Aston)

Adult 18 & Over WNC USTA 2025 · 18 & O 3.5 Women Wed evening

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-10vs WNCH Renfro (Aston)Won 40
W#1 DoublesAmanda Nichols / Jenna Winfield vs Tammy Wright / Shepard O'Connell6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Davidson / Marie Cowan vs Mindy Nelson / Jhen Paulin Pagulayan7-6, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJulia Hunt vs Becky Robinson6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKristin Janes / Sharlyn Aamodt vs Marie Dillingham / Caitlin Van Hecke6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-04-30vs WNCH Spradlin (Brevard RC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Young / Marie Cowan vs Mary Eccles Thompson / Andrea Smith6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJaney Cope / Sharlyn Aamodt vs Alexandra Murray / Jennifer Edney6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulia Hunt / Suchada Johnson vs Kyndra Prescott / Kristie Blankenship6-1, 6-0
2025-04-27vs WNCH Spradlin (Brevard RC)Won 41
W#1 DoublesAmanda Nichols / Janey Cope vs Eileen Garvey / Andrea Smith6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesDonna Davidson vs Heidi Spradlin2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJenna Winfield / Jodi Shainberg vs Alexandra Murray / Carolyn Hardin6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSharlyn Aamodt vs Bren Thompson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKelly Loisel / Denise Jackson vs Mary Eccles Thompson / Jennifer Edney7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-23vs WNCA Fortezzo (ARC S)Won 32
W#1 DoublesAmanda Nichols / Janey Cope vs Sarah Landis / Andi Elliot6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKelly Loisel vs Jennifer Yeisley6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDenise Jackson / Sharlyn Aamodt vs Sherrie Voyles / Eva Hartman3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJodi DeVerges vs Karolina Drozdz6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLisa Young / Julia Hunt vs Audrey Fortezzo / Caroline Anders6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-04-16vs WNCP van Vonno (ARC S)Won 32
W#1 DoublesJaney Cope / Jenna Winfield vs Jennifer Gillis / Anna Guthy6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJodi DeVerges vs Mary-Marlowe Scott6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLisa Young / Marie Cowan vs Aubrie Donnellan / Patricia van Vonno6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJulia Hunt vs Catherine Mitchell3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDonna Davidson / Kristin Janes vs Kylie Hopkins / Hannah Singleton6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-11vs WNCM Padgett (ARC S)Won 21
W#1 DoublesJaney Cope / Sharlyn Aamodt vs MARY PADGETT / Fiona Teague6-1, 7-6
W#1 SinglesKelly Loisel vs Meredith Silver6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJulia Hunt / Suchada Johnson vs Eleanor Thompson / Cynthia Angelo4-6, 1-6
2025-04-05vs WNCH Renfro (Aston)Won 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Young / Julia Hunt vs Tammy Wright / Amy Ager6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJaney Cope / Suchada Johnson vs Holly Renfro / Jhen Paulin Pagulayan6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJodi Shainberg / Kristin Janes vs Mindy Nelson / Marie Dillingham6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & O 3.5 Women Wed evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Jenna Winfield
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Janey Cope
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
3.77
Kelly Loisel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Jodi Shainberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Julia Hunt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.38
Donna Davidson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Sharlyn Aamodt
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.33
Suchada Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Kristin Janes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Marie Cowan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jodi DeVerges
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julia Hunt + Donna Davidson213 matchesnot enough data
Janey Cope + Jenna Winfield303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenna Winfield
22W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.88
Janey Cope
60W–16L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.84
Kelly Loisel
12W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Jodi Shainberg
16W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Julia Hunt
18W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Donna Davidson
18W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.38
Sharlyn Aamodt
18W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
Suchada Johnson
15W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Kristin Janes
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.28
Marie Cowan
19W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Jodi DeVerges
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.