Teams

CACI SILVER

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-25vs SSLT PINKWon 41
W#1 DoublesBeverly Tellis / Diana Solanki vs Susan Duffy / Madissen Allen7-5, 7-5
L#1 SinglesAngel Spivak vs Diann Bolonchuk0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesShannon Hickey / Judy Kennelley vs Urte Land / Colleen Carlson6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMikele Smith vs Marcela Rascon6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Fournier / Kim Ripka vs Rory Jaggers / Laura Downie6-2, 6-4
2021-05-18vs APR REDWon 50
W#1 DoublesMichelle Arend / Crissy Wright vs Claire Douthit / Deborah Weis6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMikele Smith vs Amy Kaufman7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJudy Kennelley / Shannon Hickey vs Clare Morey / Julie Lang6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKim Ripka vs Irina Suyumova6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBeverly Tellis / Michelle Fournier vs Emily Jensik / Linda Merrifield3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-11vs GAC BLACKLost 23
W#1 DoublesMichelle Arend / Crissy Wright vs Julie Wilson / Kerry Warburton6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesAngel Spivak vs Jennifer Holm1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBeverly Tellis / Michelle Fournier vs Samantha Goffinet / Stacie Hochstadt6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDiana Solanki vs Emily Loewenthal6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKim Ripka / Mikele Smith vs Kristi McCauley / Katie Deline6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2021-05-06vs APR REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesBeverly Tellis / Diana Solanki vs Juana Donald / Jackie Hawkey6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKim Ripka vs Amy Kaufman7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Arend / Crissy Wright vs Emily Jensik / Irina Suyumova6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAngel Spivak / Michelle Fournier vs Martha Armstrong / Stephanie Finnigan2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-04vs SSLT PINKWon 41
W#1 DoublesBeverly Tellis / Diana Solanki vs Stephanie Greco / Madissen Allen6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMichelle Fournier vs Diann Bolonchuk6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Arend / Crissy Wright vs Marcela Rascon / Laura Downie6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAngel Spivak vs McCall Board2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesShannon Hickey / Judy Kennelley vs Sandra Cranston / Stacie Chadwick6-2, 6-2
2021-04-20vs GAC BLACKLost 23
W#1 DoublesBeverly Tellis / Diana Solanki vs Stacie Hochstadt / Juliet Beckman6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKim Ripka vs Jennifer Holm3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Arend / Crissy Wright vs Julie Wilson / Kerry Warburton6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAngel Spivak vs Emily Loewenthal3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Hickey / Judy Kennelley vs Katie Deline / Katie Harrison3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LAC PURPLE7030518217
2CP BLACK6023720200
3GAC BLACK5121927248
4CACI SILVER4222823233
5MC BLACK33151536295
6SSLT PINK33131737298
7LVTA BLUE34152047346
8NJ GOLD24161434295
9KC WHITE24121839298
10LTFC BLACK24102042296
11SSLGT ORANGE15102047330
12APR RED0642652342

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Diana Solanki
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 5
4.25
Shannon Hickey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.17
Crissy Wright
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.14
Kim Ripka
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.11
Beverly Tellis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.05
Judy Kennelley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Angel Spivak
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Michelle Arend
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Michelle Fournier
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Mikele Smith
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Kennelley + Shannon Hickey271058% games+1.6% vs expected
Diana Solanki + Beverly Tellis7161% games+0.9% vs expected
Michelle Arend + Crissy Wright222150% games−1.5% vs expected
Michelle Arend + Kim Ripka224 matchesnot enough data
Kim Ripka + Crissy Wright314 matchesnot enough data
Mikele Smith + Michelle Arend123 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Fournier + Kim Ripka123 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Arend + Shannon Hickey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Diana Solanki
70W–26L career · 5 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
4.58
Shannon Hickey
44W–20L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Crissy Wright
51W–46L career · 5 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Kim Ripka
78W–90L career · 5 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
4.14
4.5
Beverly Tellis
62W–41L career · 6 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
4.11
Judy Kennelley
36W–19L career · 4 lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
4.05
Angel Spivak
6W–12L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michelle Arend
40W–44L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michelle Fournier
23W–18L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mikele Smith
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.