Teams

Mini Miss Hits

2023 Tri-One Doubles League · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.40 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-10-01vs Dare DoublesLost 01
L#1 DoublesAsami Kramberg / Eriko Francisco vs Jessica Nishikawa / Rachel Motta1-6, 3-6
2023-09-24vs Dare DoublesLost 01
L#1 DoublesLetha DeCaires / Asami Kramberg vs Rachel Motta / Jessica Nishikawa0-6, 0-6
2023-09-17vs GOFLost 01
L#1 DoublesIris Katsura / Susan Locquiao vs Patricia Moore / Janet Gordon4-6, 1-6
2023-09-10vs Warrior PrincessLost 01
L#1 DoublesAsami Kramberg / Letha DeCaires vs Caylie Uyema / Dayna Luka0-6, 1-6
2023-09-03vs AiyaLost 01
L#1 DoublesAsami Kramberg / Susan Locquiao vs Noelle Chun / Emily Louis3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-08-27vs Girls Just Wanna Have FunLost 01
L#1 DoublesAsami Kramberg / Susan Locquiao vs Gerri Takayama / Anna Womack2-6, 5-7
2023-08-13vs GOFLost 01
L#1 DoublesLetha DeCaires / Eriko Francisco vs Ayelish Kerber / Janet Gordon2-6, 2-6
2023-08-06vs Warrior PrincessLost 01
L#1 DoublesIris Katsura / Asami Kramberg vs Caylie Uyema / Alyssa Watanabe1-6, 0-6
2023-07-30vs AiyaLost 01
L#1 DoublesShiori Tang / Letha DeCaires vs JUDY Guo / Erin Jyo0-6, 0-6
2023-07-23vs Girls Just Wanna Have FunLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Locquiao / Shiori Tang vs Gerri Takayama / Lori Loo3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Aiya9191353
2Warrior Princess7373649
3Girls Just Wanna Have Fun46461296
4GOF373715102
5Mini Miss Hits01001020121

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Shiori Tang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Eriko Francisco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Asami Kramberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Iris Katsura
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Susan Locquiao
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Letha DeCaires
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eriko Francisco + Asami Kramberg2546% games−1.9% vs expected
Letha DeCaires + Asami Kramberg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shiori Tang
74W–60L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Eriko Francisco
48W–55L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Asami Kramberg
21W–34L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Iris Katsura
102W–100L career · 2 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Susan Locquiao
90W–55L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
3.5
Letha DeCaires
26W–78L career · 4 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.