Teams

YMCA Robinson

2023 OH OV FALL Combo Charleston · 2023 Fall 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.43 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-11-04vs YMCA CochranLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Parker / Andrea Mitias vs McKay Mignault / Marjorie Swecker2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnita Tate / Hannah Schoolfield vs Kelly Babiak / Ruth Mullins4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Morris / Angela Cooke vs Lisa Hammonds / Vinutha Vishnu2-6, 1-6
2023-10-14vs CTC SusonLost 03
L#1 DoublesVida Johnson / Andrea Mitias vs Mary Veloso / Jene Collins2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnita Tate / Lora Kirk vs Julie Jarrett / Jessica Wisnewski3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAmanda Morris / Judy Arthur vs Susan Murad / Amanda Campbell5-7, 1-6
2023-10-07vs YMCA CochranLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Neenan / Lora Kirk vs McKay Mignault / NUVIA VILLAMIZAR1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Morris / Angela Cooke vs Shelby King / Joan Waugh1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Osborne / Christin Withrow vs Karen Cochran / Marjorie Swecker1-6, 3-6
2023-09-30vs CTC SusonLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa Osborne / Judy Arthur vs Mary Cook / Ursula Suson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Parker / Christin Withrow vs Susan Murad / Victoria Russo4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2023 Fall 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CTC Suson226614118
2YMCA Robinson0411122131

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Hannah Schoolfield
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Tammy Robinson
published
3.28
Melissa Osborne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Anita Tate
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Christin Withrow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Amanda Morris
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Parker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Andrea Mitias
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.51
Angela Cooke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Judy Arthur
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lora Kirk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Neenan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Vida Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lora Kirk + Angela Cooke4259% games+14.4% vs expected
Tammy Robinson + Elizabeth Parker5458% games+11.8% vs expected
Amanda Morris + Anita Tate8951% games+4.8% vs expected
Melissa Osborne + Anita Tate1736% games−1.2% vs expected
Mary Neenan + Tammy Robinson21039% games−2.9% vs expected
Hannah Schoolfield + Angela Cooke5256% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Mitias + Christin Withrow404 matchesnot enough data
Mary Neenan + Elizabeth Parker134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hannah Schoolfield
35W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Tammy Robinson
59W–75L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
3.30
Melissa Osborne
27W–69L career · 2 lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.28
3.5
Anita Tate
56W–84L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Christin Withrow
44W–32L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Amanda Morris
27W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Parker
56W–55L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Andrea Mitias
52W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Angela Cooke
30W–32L career · 2 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
2.51
Judy Arthur
22W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lora Kirk
33W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Neenan
5W–33L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Vida Johnson
11W–25L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.