← Teams

PTC-Lee

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.35 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Rachel Novak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.55
Cathleen Lang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Ann Lasocki
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Gretchen Newcomb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Jing Feng
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
Lyudmila Leissler
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.84
Valerie Neill
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.84
Karen Kraus
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
—
Debbie Frankel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Kimberly Stockstad
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-06-17Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesLyudmila Leissler / Rachel Novak vs Vivian Nguyen / Angelina Warriner6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAnn Lasocki vs Dolores Corley6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Kraus / Elise D Harvey vs Sandi Martes / Andrea Vicino7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesValerie Neill / Lauren Smith vs Suki Birge / Crystal Miller6-4, 7-6
2023-06-10Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesKimberly Stockstad / Debbie Frankel vs Mary Lowblad / Cara Williams6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLyudmila Leissler vs Maryam Farinola7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGretchen Newcomb / Rachel Novak vs Loo Yah Leong / Anita Rockwell6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesValerie Regan / Ann Lasocki vs Tina Prassas / Laurence Dupray6-1, 6-4
2023-06-03Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesAnn Lasocki / Lauren Smith vs Gina Ossanna / Morgan Cowling6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesLyudmila Leissler vs Tina Farrelly6-1, 6-4
2023-05-21Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesGretchen Newcomb / Valerie Neill vs Mary Murphy / Kim Wright6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSarah Larson / Karen Kraus vs Alison Davis / Laura Laney6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesValerie Regan / Ann Lasocki vs Barbra Jorgensen / Gretchen Wagner6-2, 6-4
2023-05-06Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesCathleen Lang / Lyudmila Leissler vs Tara Baumann / Barbara Hart6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesYu Zhang / Jing Feng vs Natasha Rinard / Jane Paulsen6-2, 6-1
2023-04-30Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesYu Zhang / Valerie Neill vs Vicki Blunt / Cheryl Geisler6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRachel Novak / Gretchen Newcomb vs Heidi Palena / Heidi Kjos7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLyudmila Leissler / Rose Lee vs ROSY ALANIS / Angela Benedict7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-29Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJing Feng / Yu Zhang vs Kiersten Lake / Robin Welter6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLyudmila Leissler / Cathleen Lang vs Lisa Barsotti / Patricia Eargle6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKimberly Stockstad / Debbie Frankel vs Ruth Semon / Susan Judge6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2023-04-15Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesGretchen Newcomb / Rachel Novak vs Julia Henry / Jane Paulsen6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLyudmila Leissler vs Kimberly Seely3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKimberly Stockstad / Debbie Frankel vs Angie Cunningham / Sarah Leslie6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Rachel Novak
71W–39L career
1%98%0%
3.73
3.5
Cathleen Lang
67W–68L career
0%68%32%
3.55
3.5
Ann Lasocki
22W–36L career
0%99%1%
3.28
3.5
Gretchen Newcomb
49W–70L career
1%99%0%
3.26
3.5
Jing Feng
113W–80L career
1%99%0%
3.25
3.5
Lyudmila Leissler
69W–45L career
not enough data
—
3
Valerie Neill
48W–76L career
0%96%3%
2.84
3
Karen Kraus
79W–102L career
0%97%2%
2.84
3
Debbie Frankel
24W–58L career
not enough data
—
3
Kimberly Stockstad
18W–38L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.