Teams

YMCA 3.5

2026 18&Over Men · 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.33 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-07-25vs Syracuse: SFTC - WallensteinLost 01
L#1 SinglesVaibhav Singh vs Nathanael Kelley4-6, 2-6
2026-07-18vs Syracuse: SFTC - WallensteinSplit 22
L#1 DoublesPrashant Kaul / Xiwu Sun vs Jonathan Dee / Norifumi Urao1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWei Lee / Mike Heinz vs Kyle Voyer / Ben Weiss6-7
W#2 SinglesVaibhav Singh vs Nathanael Kelley6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJames Burgess / Daniel Kublick vs Gururaj Krishnan / Stephen Nesspor6-4, 7-6
2026-07-11vs Syracuse: SFTC - WallensteinLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnthony Farella / Nicholas Rys vs Jonathan Dee / Kyle Voyer2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMike Heinz vs Jay Lee7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDan Ferguson / Wei Lee vs Stephen Nesspor / David Ng6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-27vs Syracuse: SFTC - WallensteinSplit 22
L#1 DoublesWei Lee / Amro Mohamed vs Kyle Voyer / Ben Weiss3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMike Heinz vs Kevin Garvey3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDaniel Kublick vs Peter Smith6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesXiwu Sun / James Burgess vs Andrew Wallenstein / Stephen Nesspor7-6, 6-2
2026-06-20vs Syracuse: SFTC - WallensteinSplit 22
L#1 DoublesWei Lee / Karl Offen vs Kyle Voyer / Ben Weiss4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew Harvey / Mike Heinz vs David Ng / William Shampine6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesDaniel Kublick vs Kevin Garvey6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesFenghua Li / Xiwu Sun vs Stephen Nesspor / Andrew Wallenstein6-4, 6-2
2026-06-13vs Syracuse: SFTC - WallensteinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKarl Offen / Prashant Kaul vs Kyle Voyer / Norifumi Urao3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesDaniel Kublick vs Peter Smith6-1, 6-1
2026-06-06vs Syracuse: SFTC - WallensteinWon 21
W#1 DoublesPrashant Kaul / Karl Offen vs Jonathan Dee / Norifumi Urao4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesVaibhav Singh vs Kevin Garvey4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDan Ferguson / Thomas Umina vs Stephen Nesspor / Andrew Wallenstein7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-30vs Syracuse: SFTC - WallensteinWon 20
W#2 DoublesNicholas Rys / Prashant Kaul vs Kyle Voyer / Stephen Nesspor6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMike Heinz vs Ben Weiss4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-05-16vs Syracuse: SFTC - WallensteinLost 12
L#1 DoublesWei Lee / Richard Ingraham vs Jonathan Dee / Norifumi Urao5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesXiwu Sun / Amro Mohamed vs Kyle Voyer / Kevin Garvey3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesVaibhav Singh vs James Hookway6-2, 6-2
2026-05-09vs Syracuse: SFTC - WallensteinWon 10
W#1 SinglesVaibhav Singh vs Kevin Garvey7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Richard Ingraham
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.50
Fenghua Li
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.46
Amro Mohamed
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.41
Anthony Farella
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.41
Mike Heinz
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.39
Michael Green
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
3.37
Karl Offen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
James Burgess
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.32
Vaibhav Singh
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.31
Kurt Concilla
published
3.30
Wei Lee
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.27
Prashant Kaul
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.24
Xiwu Sun
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Thomas Umina
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Matthew Harvey
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.13
Daniel Kublick
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Dan Ferguson
published 3
Nicholas Rys
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Yi Zhang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Heinz + Dan Ferguson1438% games+1.6% vs expected
Anthony Farella + Amro Mohamed6454% games−0.3% vs expected
Fenghua Li + Wei Lee5346% games−20.1% vs expected
Fenghua Li + Xiwu Sun6070% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Harvey + Mike Heinz224 matchesnot enough data
Karl Offen + Prashant Kaul224 matchesnot enough data
Richard Ingraham + Wei Lee224 matchesnot enough data
Amro Mohamed + Wei Lee224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Richard Ingraham
134W–40L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.63
Fenghua Li
63W–31L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Amro Mohamed
30W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Anthony Farella
79W–44L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
3.41
Mike Heinz
12W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
3.41
Michael Green
5W–13L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Karl Offen
53W–59L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
James Burgess
44W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Vaibhav Singh
6W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Kurt Concilla
19W–29L career · no lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
3.31
Wei Lee
26W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Prashant Kaul
10W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Xiwu Sun
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
Thomas Umina
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Matthew Harvey
21W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
3
Daniel Kublick
5W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.13
3
Dan Ferguson
9W–26L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nicholas Rys
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Yi Zhang
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.