Teams

Wynlakes- Christenberry

2025 Spring USTA 18 & Over Night League - Montgomery · 2.5 Women Night

9 players · average NTRP 2.60 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-24vs Wynlakes-AndersonWon 21
W#1 DoublesSenna Colson / Brooke Glassford vs Samantha Eley / Bailey Little6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJennifer Christenberry vs Isabel Anderson2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCarley Jamieson / Cristen Hecht vs Whitney Barranco / Payton Miller6-2, 6-4
2025-03-23vs MCC AkinsLost 12
L#1 DoublesMeg Stone / Senna Colson vs Kendell Willett / Jennifer Vann0-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesShay Rogers vs Chris Akins7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCameron Norris / Kindall Auman vs Jamie Kidd / Joy Kaplan3-6, 1-6
2025-02-03vs Wynlakes-AndersonWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarley Jamieson / Cristen Hecht vs Lily Nizam / Giulliana Porter6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBrooke Glassford vs Bailey Little6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMeg Stone / Anna Wood vs Samantha Eley / Alex Woolard0-6, 1-6
2025-01-28vs MCC AkinsLost 02
L#1 DoublesCristen Hecht / Cameron Norris vs Chris Akins / Kendell Willett4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKindall Auman / Jennifer Christenberry vs Lauren Fleming / Joy Kaplan1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Shay Rogers
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.58
Brooke Glassford
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.39
Cristen Hecht
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.30
Cameron Norris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Carley Jamieson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.10
Jennifer Christenberry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
1.81
Anna Wood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Kindall Auman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Senna Colson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shay Rogers
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Brooke Glassford
12W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
2.5
Cristen Hecht
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Cameron Norris
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
2.5
Carley Jamieson
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Christenberry
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Anna Wood
4W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.81
Kindall Auman
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Senna Colson
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.