Teams

Ossman/Nashville

2023 Tri-Level 55 & Over - Nashville · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Saturday 9:00 am

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Saturday 9:00 am have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Tammy Jirjis
published
Brenda Ossman
published 4
3.67
Loralie Liggett
published
3.62
Maura Fitzgerald
published
3.56
Jan Phanthalangsy
published
3.38
Thalia Kahl
published
3.35
Susan Manley
published
3.34
Tracey Williamson
published
3.33
Jacqueline King
published 3.5
3.31
Linda Payne
published
3.25
Laurie Passmore
published
3.22
Mary Carkhuff
published
3.14
Joy Helton
published
3.07
Kerri Frye
published
2.90
Kim Bright
published
2.71
Glenda Anderson
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerri Frye + Susan Manley1445% games−12.5% vs expected
Joy Helton + Mary Carkhuff224 matchesnot enough data
Joy Helton + Susan Manley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Jirjis
23W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Brenda Ossman
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Loralie Liggett
21W–28L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
Maura Fitzgerald
24W–22L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
Jan Phanthalangsy
24W–32L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
Thalia Kahl
27W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.38
Susan Manley
42W–58L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.35
Tracey Williamson
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.34
3.5
Jacqueline King
16W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
Linda Payne
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
3.31
Laurie Passmore
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
3.25
Mary Carkhuff
13W–16L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
Joy Helton
20W–16L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
Kerri Frye
10W–27L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Kim Bright
20W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Glenda Anderson
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.