Teams

Jackson/Memphis

2025 Mixed 40 & Over - Memphis · 4.5 Mixed 40 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 4.38 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-20vs McCalla/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeremy Park / Carley Myrick vs Wang-Ying Glasgow / Tu Pham7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMeredith Haselwood / Tristan Jackson vs Paul Hagerman / Kimberly Cox6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMatthew Gregg / Aimee Gregg vs Hamed Yessoufou / Dana Bray4-6, 3-6
2025-07-13vs McCalla/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Gardner / Tonia Gardner vs Stephen Mansour / Caroline Delpriore5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTristan Jackson / Carmen Lewis vs Kimberly Cox / Michael Brennan7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMatthew Gregg / Aimee Gregg vs Shannon McCalla / Tu Pham0-6, 1-6
2025-07-06vs McCalla/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesMeredith Haselwood / Tristan Jackson vs Wang-Ying Glasgow / Hamed Yessoufou2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Gardner / Carmen Lewis vs John Butorac / Allison Musick6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJeremy Park / Carley Myrick vs Dana Bray / Gregory Stine6-0, 6-4
2025-06-29vs McCalla/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesSantiago Arbelaez / ANITA ARBELAEZ vs Kimberly Cox / Michael Brennan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTristan Jackson / Carley Myrick vs Shannon McCalla / Paul Hagerman5-7, 1-6
2025-06-14vs McCalla/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesMeredith Haselwood / Tristan Jackson vs Allison Musick / John Butorac4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTonia Gardner / John Gardner vs Paul Hagerman / Kimberly Cox1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Gregg / Aimee Gregg vs Wang-Ying Glasgow / Gregory Stine6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Carley Myrick
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.10
Santiago Arbelaez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.09
ANITA ARBELAEZ
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Meredith Haselwood
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.06
Tristan Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.84
Carmen Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.82
Aimee Gregg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.59
Matthew Gregg
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Tonia Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jeremy Park
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aimee Gregg + Matthew Gregg0532% games−14.2% vs expected
Tristan Jackson + Meredith Haselwood1437% gamesnot enough data
Tristan Jackson + Carley Myrick044 matchesnot enough data
ANITA ARBELAEZ + Santiago Arbelaez134 matchesnot enough data
Carley Myrick + Jeremy Park303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carley Myrick
39W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
4.15
Santiago Arbelaez
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.10
4.5
ANITA ARBELAEZ
22W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.09
Meredith Haselwood
20W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.09
Tristan Jackson
15W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.06
4
Carmen Lewis
35W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
4.5
Aimee Gregg
14W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.82
Matthew Gregg
16W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.59
Tonia Gardner
27W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
Jeremy Park
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.