Teams

CCTA55/Chillemi/Berkeley Hall

2022 USTA Adult 55 & Over · Adult Women - 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.81 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Becky Lofstead
published 4
Donna Wheeler
published 4
3.70
Jill MacLaughlin
published
3.65
Dori Polites
published 4
3.62
3.61
Debbie Picano
published 4
3.60
Mary Grebe
published
3.58
Janet Henke
published
3.46
Robin Protheroe
published
3.44
Lynn Bunn
published
Diana Fitzgerald
published 3.5
3.24
Donna Strauss
published 3.5
3.13
Barbara Parker
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Picano + Dori Polites5067% gamesnot enough data
Robin Protheroe + Becky Lofstead213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Becky Lofstead
78W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Donna Wheeler
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jill MacLaughlin
44W–41L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Dori Polites
35W–32L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Blythe Merrifield
11W–20L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Debbie Picano
39W–41L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
Mary Grebe
36W–53L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Janet Henke
11W–19L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.58
Robin Protheroe
10W–29L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.46
Lynn Bunn
44W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Diana Fitzgerald
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Donna Strauss
31W–52L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Barbara Parker
17W–37L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
Kathleen Oelschlager
25W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.