Teams

Su.Braga18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.94 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-12vs Ma.Cambo18AWon 32
W#1 DoublesSarah Copley / Kathryn Shields vs Madeline Cambo / Shanie Kpanay6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesSuzanne Braga vs Courtney McMickens6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Soleim / Tina Goertz vs Kelsey Brandt / Sam Fouser4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesMichelle Staub vs Xinyang Dong1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDebbie Cox / Megan Slocum vs Autumn Beam / Callan Fike6-4, 7-6
2024-05-10vs Co.Haynes18ALost 13
W#1 DoublesLaurel Saunders / Sarah Soleim vs Erin Hemminger / Sarah Lukz7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMegan Slocum vs Connie Haynes1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCassy Albertson / Sarah Copley vs CAROLINE FLAMANT / Brianna Shait3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Cox / Suzanne Braga vs Michele Lagerstedt / Jennifer van Campen2-6, 1-6
2024-05-02vs Me.Gill18ALost 13
W#1 DoublesLaurel Saunders / Sarah Soleim vs Jaime Gaskins / Sarah Warren3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKathryn Shields vs Catie Cunningham2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Braga / Chrissy Hartsfield vs Leigh Stallings / Claudia Cadet1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Staub / Debbie Cox vs Kristin Esham / Melanie Gill2-6, 5-7
2024-04-28vs Kr.Levine18ALost 12
L#1 SinglesMegan Slocum vs Rachel McLean6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Soleim / Laurel Saunders vs Laurie Holderness / Beth Farrell7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSuzanne Braga vs Elizabeth Carroll1-6, 3-6
2024-04-14vs Br.Robinson18A3.0Lost 12
L#1 SinglesKathryn Shields vs Jennifer Martin1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesCassy Albertson vs Alexa Spain6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTina Goertz / Debbie Cox vs Jenny Sweet / Ellen Zimmerman7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2024-03-17vs Ju.Andrews18ALost 03
L#1 DoublesKathryn Shields / Kathryn White vs Julianne Andrews / Lorah Henry0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCassy Albertson vs Parker Rumley3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTina Goertz / Sarah Soleim vs Brooke Jenkins / Settle Monroe1-6, 0-6
2024-03-10vs La.Kane18ASplit 22
L#1 DoublesMichelle Staub / Megan Slocum vs Rose Trimpey-Warhaftig / Eva Frecker2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKathryn Shields vs Mary T Long7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCassy Albertson / Kathryn White vs Sabrina Kane / Cathy Williams6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSuzanne Braga vs Lauren Kane6-1, 6-1
2024-03-03vs Je.Sagal Solomon18ALost 13
W#1 DoublesSarah Copley / Cassy Albertson vs Dana Earle / Anna Kethey6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMegan Slocum vs Jennifer Kimball4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHolly Stephens / Sarah Soleim vs Michele Nowicki / Christy van Ness6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Braga / Debbie Cox vs Corinne Alavi / Jennifer Guy7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Laurel Saunders
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Sarah Soleim
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.77
Kathryn Shields
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 3
2.72
Kathryn White
published
2.71
Megan Slocum
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.70
Suzanne Braga
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.69
Cassy Albertson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.68
Sarah Copley
published
2.61
Michelle Staub
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.35
Tina Goertz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Braga + Megan Slocum3252% games+1.3% vs expected
Tina Goertz + Laurel Saunders1745% games+1.3% vs expected
Sarah Soleim + Laurel Saunders6549% games+0.0% vs expected
Tina Goertz + Sarah Soleim0834% gamesnot enough data
Tina Goertz + Megan Slocum1445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Laurel Saunders
40W–43L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Sarah Soleim
22W–50L career · 9 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Kathryn Shields
88W–91L career · 10 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
Kathryn White
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Megan Slocum
32W–45L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Suzanne Braga
36W–55L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Cassy Albertson
40W–39L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
Sarah Copley
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Michelle Staub
53W–90L career · 3 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.61
2.5
Tina Goertz
83W–199L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%87%13%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.