Teams

Parkland - Cadena

2022 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Spring Night · 4.5 Adult 18 & Over Men

16 players · average NTRP 4.41 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-30vs Broward/MarcanoLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephen Markward / Atif Raoof vs Marc Winkler / Victor Caba0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAnthony Cottone / James Taylor vs Daniel Delgado / Eduardo Alvarez5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAlejandro Cadena / Jay Graff vs Santiago Salvador Rio E / Marcos Daniel Gonzalez5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-06-23vs Ltc - MattWon 21
L#1 SinglesMatthew Kramer vs Matt Sauerman2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlejandro Cadena / Jay Graff vs Brian Stephanak / Denny Windgassen6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAnthony Cottone vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-09vs Ltc - PhillipsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlejandro Cadena / Atif Raoof vs Kai Blache / Ryan Sauerman6-3, 6-1
2022-05-26vs Jetc - CostanzoWon 10
W#3 DoublesStephen Markward / Matthew Kramer vs Michael Costanzo / Angel Matos7-5, 6-3
2022-05-19vs Midtown - SolerWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlejandro Cadena / Jay Graff vs Kenny Torrellas / Pipo Torrellas3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnthony Cottone / Matthew Kramer vs Jay Eisenberg / Juan Pablo Cofino6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAtif Raoof / Diego Velasquez vs Diego Grimblat / Jorge Torres7-5, 6-3
2022-05-05vs Veltri - ValenciaLost 12
W#2 DoublesAlejandro Cadena / Jay Graff vs Jared Lehn / Ignacio Sarria6-2, 7-6
L#2 SinglesMatthew Kramer vs Enzo Zarrillo6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAtif Raoof / Zachary Lane vs Luis Cotamo / Brian Ambrugna Aiello4-6, 4-6
2022-04-28vs Ltc - MattSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlejandro Cadena / Jay Graff vs Matt Sauerman / Colin Ferrer1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAtif Raoof / Matthew Kramer vs Sean Lowery / Alejandro Pacheco6-2, 6-2
2022-04-21vs Broward/MarcanoLost 03
L#1 DoublesAntonio Marcelin / David Williams vs Eduardo Alvarez / Daniel Delgado1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAlejandro Cadena / Esteban Lopez vs Hugo Moreno / Marc Winkler4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAtif Raoof / Diego Velasquez vs Anibal Ciffoni / Marcos Daniel Gonzalez3-6, 2-6
2022-04-14vs Ltc - PhillipsWon 21
W#1 DoublesEsteban Lopez / Antonio Marcelin vs Anthony Phillips / Marcelo Salas6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMatthew Kramer vs Jassiel Rodriguez7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAtif Raoof / David Williams vs Travis Johnson / Raul Mendez4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 18 & Over Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
James Taylor
published 4.5
4.34
Matthew Kramer
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.30
Alejandro Cadena
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.30
Ronen Bickel
published
4.24
Evan David
published 4.5
4.23
Esteban Lopez
published 4.5
4.21
Anthony Cottone
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.21
Arturo Carrasco
published 4.5
4.17
Antonio Marcelin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Stephen Markward
published
4.10
Atif Raoof
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.09
David Williams
published 4.5
3.81
Giovanni Guido
published 4
3.68
Diego Velasquez
published 4
Jay Graff
published
Les Liese
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anthony Cottone + Atif Raoof224 matchesnot enough data
Atif Raoof + Antonio Marcelin134 matchesnot enough data
Atif Raoof + Alejandro Cadena314 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Markward + Ronen Bickel314 matchesnot enough data
Anthony Cottone + Alejandro Cadena123 matchesnot enough data
Alejandro Cadena + Arturo Carrasco213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
James Taylor
8W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
4.45
Matthew Kramer
79W–52L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
4.34
4.5
Alejandro Cadena
110W–54L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
Ronen Bickel
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Evan David
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Esteban Lopez
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Anthony Cottone
28W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Arturo Carrasco
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Antonio Marcelin
87W–111L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
4.17
Stephen Markward
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Atif Raoof
106W–101L career · 7 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
4.10
4.5
David Williams
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
4.09
4
Giovanni Guido
12W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Diego Velasquez
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Jay Graff
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Les Liese
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.