Teams

TCRC Hennessey

2023 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 2.95 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Cam Nguyen
published 3.5
3.16
Kelly Schuler
published
3.15
Donna Hall
published 3.5
3.13
Beth Parrish
published 3.5
3.12
Melissa Skorupa
published
3.01
2.92
Katherine Mortimer
published
Anne Hennessey
published 3
2.50
Ashleigh Witt
published 3
2.40
Anne Meng
published 2.5
2.23
Christina Saunders
published 2.5
2.21
Autumn Nabors
published 2.5
1.95
Caroline Lacy
published 2.5
Lisa Taylor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Hall + Katherine Mortimer033 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Mortimer + Melissa Skorupa033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cam Nguyen
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Kelly Schuler
17W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%11%89%
3.16
3.5
Donna Hall
13W–21L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Beth Parrish
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
Melissa Skorupa
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Amanda Stoneburner
16W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.01
Katherine Mortimer
7W–21L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.92
3
Anne Hennessey
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Roetger
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Ashleigh Witt
15W–9L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
Anne Meng
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%79%21%
2.40
2.5
Christina Saunders
1W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Autumn Nabors
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.21
2.5
Caroline Lacy
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Lisa Taylor
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.