Teams

Lynch-GI

2025 CORTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring · Men 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-02-08vs CORTA/Nicholas GarciaLost 03
L#1 DoublesCameron Kersey / Randall Ruark vs Michael Bleke / Jayson Leatherland4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKenneth Copperwheat / Casey Galligan vs Forrest Champion / Michael Ernst6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesZachary Fletcher vs Nicholas Garcia2-6, 3-6
2025-02-05vs CORTA/Nicholas GarciaLost 02
L#1 DoublesZachary Fletcher / Jay Brodwyn vs Will Meador / Michael Bleke4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCasey Galligan / Philip Thayer vs Stephen Watkins / Bo Galvin3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-01-04vs CORTA/Nicholas GarciaLost 13
W#1 DoublesMichael Lynch / Cameron Kersey vs Joey Davis / Matthew Stewart6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesZachary Fletcher vs Forrest Champion1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRandall Ruark / Bryan Evans vs Nicholas Garcia / Shaun OHara2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKenneth Copperwheat / Chaz Wilson vs Michael Ernst / David Mize1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Zachary Fletcher
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Casey Galligan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Chaz Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Cameron Kersey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Jay Brodwyn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Randall Ruark
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.48
Kenneth Copperwheat
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.42
Philip Thayer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zachary Fletcher + Kenneth Copperwheat3248% gamesnot enough data
Randall Ruark + Philip Thayer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zachary Fletcher
39W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Casey Galligan
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Chaz Wilson
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Cameron Kersey
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Jay Brodwyn
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
Randall Ruark
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
Kenneth Copperwheat
19W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
Philip Thayer
2W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.